RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT AND BURGLARY CRIME RISK: A SPACE SYNTAX ANALYSIS OF CRIME AREAS

Authors

  • Idris Isah Iliyasu School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA, PENANG, MALAYSIA
  • Aldrin Abdullah School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA, PENANG, MALAYSIA
  • Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA, PENANG, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1347

Keywords:

Burglary crime, Permeability, Residential environment, Space syntax, Urban form

Abstract

This paper explores the different morphological characteristics of residential neighbourhood spaces to understand the factors that constitute burglary crime risk in the area. The methods used for data collection include field surveys and Block Environmental Inventory. Meanwhile, inferential statistics, Geographic Information System and space syntax tools were used for data analysis. Findings indicated the influence of neighbourhood-built features on burglary crime and the vulnerability of areas to future crime risk. The analysis shows the spatial variation of crime risk factors across the study areas and how that shaped the understanding of burglary activities in the area. The study explores the influence of the permeability of grid iron layouts on vulnerability and explains high and low crime rates in the areas of Perumahan Mahsuri and Perumahan Sunway Tunas, respectively. Overall, the paper suggests further research to correlate these spatial explanations with the socio-demographics of the areas studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A., Hedayati Marzbali, M., Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J., & Bahauddin, A. (2015). Territorial features, disorder and fear of crime in residential neighbourhoods in Malaysia: testing for multigroup invariance. Global Crime, 16(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2015.1019611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2015.1019611

Armitage, R. (2016). Crime prevention through environmental design. Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis: Second Edition, 259–285. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709826

Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., & Toker, U. (2006). Conflict between Space and Crime: Exploring the Relationship between Spatial Configuration and Crime Location. 37th Annual Conference of EDRA, Atlanta, 167–168.

Berghauser Pont, M., Haupt, P., & D’Laine, C. (2010). Spacematrix: space, density and urban form.

Berghauser Pont, M., & Olsson, J. (2018). Typology based on three density variables central to Spacematrix using cluster analysis. September 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.4995/isuf2017.2017.5319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/ISUF2017.2017.5319

Boivin, R., & Felson, M. (2018). Crimes by Visitors Versus Crimes by Residents: The Influence of Visitor Inflows. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(2), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9341-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9341-1

Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1975). Residential Burglary and Urban Form. Urban Studies, 12(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987520080531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987520080531

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Curman, Andresen, & Brantingham. (2015). Crime and Place: A Longitudinal Examination of Street Segment Patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9228-3

Curman, Andresen, & Brantingham. (2020). Crime and Place: A Longitudinal Examination of Street Segment Patterns in Vancouver, BC Author (s): Andrea S. N. Curman, Martin A. Andresen and Paul J. Brantingham Published by: Springer Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43552172 Crime a. 31(1), 127–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9228-3

Donnelly, P. G. (2010). Newman, Oscar: Defensible Space Theory Newman, Oscar: Defensible Space Theory.

Dwidinita, D., Sunarti, E. T., & Setijanti, P. (2018). Understanding the Relationship between Urban Morphology and Crime in South Krembangan, Surabaya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 8(7), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.8.7.2018.p7929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.8.7.2018.p7929

Felson, M. (2017). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Crime Opportunity Theories: Routine Activity, Rational Choice and Their Variants, 25(4), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095301-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095301-5

Felson, M., & Boivin, R. (2015). Daily crime flows within a city. Crime Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-015-0039-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-015-0039-0

Frank, R., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. L. (2012a). Criminal directionality and the structure of urban form. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.004

Frank, R., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. L. (2012b). Criminal directionality and the structure of urban form. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.004

Groff, E., & Taniguchi, T. (2019). Quantifying Crime Prevention Potential of Near-Repeat Burglary. Police Quarterly, 22(3), 330–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119828052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119828052

Iliyasu, I. I., Abdullah, A., & Marzbali, M. H. (2022a). Urban Morphology and Crime Patterns in Urban areas: A review of the literature. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 9(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i1.17301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i1.17301

Iliyasu, I. I., Abdullah, A., & Marzbali, M. H. (2022b). Spatial Pattern of Burglary in Residential Neighbourhoods: A case study of Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(04). https://doi.10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2022-0033

Irvin-Erickson, Y. (2014). Identifying risky places for crime: An analysis of the criminogenic spatiotemporal influences of landscape features on street robberies. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/45632/

Kalfaoglu, & Okkali. (2022). The reflection of Newman’s defensible space theory on Turkey’s neighbourhoods: typomorphological analysis of safe space within an analytical framework. Open House International. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2022-0064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2022-0064

Kamalipour, H., Faizi, M., & Memarian, G. (2014). Safe Place by Design: Urban Crime in Relation to Spatiality and Sociality. June, 152–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2014.22015

Kim, Y. A. (2018). Examining the Relationship Between the Structural Characteristics of Place and Crime by Imputing Census Block Data in Street Segments: Is the Pain Worth the Gain? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 67–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9323-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9323-8

Kim, Y. A., & Hipp, J. R. (2020). Street Egohood: An Alternative Perspective of Measuring Neighbourhood and Spatial Patterns of Crime. In Journal of Quantitative Criminology (Vol. 36, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09410-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09410-3

Kinney, J. B., Brantingham, P. L., Wuschke, K., Kirk, M. G., & Brantingham, P. J. (2008). Crime attractors, generators and detractors: Land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment, 34(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.34.1.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.34.1.62

Laouar, D., Mazouz, S., & Nes, A. Van. (2017). Space and Crime in the North-African city of Annaba. Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, 196.1-196.9.

Matlamat, I., & Mampan, P. (2019). Malaysia 2019. 2013(032500), 1–9.

Netto, V. (2015). Reflections on space syntax as sociospatial theory. SSS 2015 - 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, 1–11.

Ostwald, M. J., & Dawes, M. (2018). The Mathematics of the Modernist Villa Architectural Analysis Using Space Syntax and Isovists. In Mathematics and the Built Environment. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71647-3

Pitner, R. O., Yu, M. S., & Brown, E. (2012). Making neighborhoods safer: Examining predictors of residents’ concerns about neighborhood safety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.003

Pont, M. B. (2018). Twenty-fourth international seminar on urban form, Valencia, Spain 27–29 September 2017. Urban Morphology, 22(1), 80–83.

Pont, M. B., & Marcus, L. (2015). What can typology explain that configuration cannot? SSS 2015 - 10th International Space Syntax Symposium.

Porter, J. R., Capellan, J., & Chintakrindi, S. (2015). Social Disorganization Theory. In The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx169

Spicer, V., & Fraser, M. A. S. (1991). The Geometry of Fear: An Environmental Perspective on Fear and the Perception of Crime.

Summers, & Johnson. (2017). Does the Configuration of the Street Network Influence Where Outdoor Serious Violence Takes Place? Using Space Syntax to Test Crime Pattern Theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(2), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9306-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9306-9

Vandeviver, C., & Steenbeek, W. (2019). The (In)Stability of Residential Burglary Patterns on Street Segments: The Case of Antwerp, Belgium 2005–2016. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9371-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9371-8

Xiong, H. (2016). Urban Crime and Social Disorganization in China. In Urban Crime and Social Disorganization in China. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-859-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-859-5

Yue, H., & Zhu, X. (2021). The influence of urban built environment on residential burglary in China: Testing the encounter and enclosure hypotheses. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 21(4), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819874868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819874868

Yue, H., Zhu, X., Ye, X., Hu, T., & Kudva, S. (2018). Modelling the effects of street permeability on burglary in Wuhan, China. Applied Geography, 98, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.06.005

Zainol, H., Md Sakip, S. R., Sazali, M. F., Mohd Latif, H., & Mohamad Bahari, N. A. (2022). The contributory elements in natural access control of crime prevention in residential housing. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 9(1), 303. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i1.17305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i1.17305

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Iliyasu, I. I., Abdullah, A., & Marzbali, M. H. (2023). RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT AND BURGLARY CRIME RISK: A SPACE SYNTAX ANALYSIS OF CRIME AREAS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(28). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1347

Issue

Vol. 21 (2023): PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL : Volume 21, Issue 4, 2023

Section

Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright & Creative Commons Licence

eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>