EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF DENSITY ON ACCESS TO LOCAL FACILITIES IN URBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS

Authors

  • Wan Nurul Mardiah Wan Mohd Rani Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v12i4.122

Keywords:

Density, urban form, social sustainability, access to services and local facilities

Abstract

Local services and facilities in residential neighbourhoods play an important role towards the social sustainability of local residents. It is believed that having good provision and access to these local services and facilities would contribute significantly to the quality of life and residents’ well-being. The form of the neighbourhood influences the way people live in the neighbourhood. The way people settle in neighbourhood’s shapes the quality of life, the richness of the local economy, the level of social cohesion, the level of safety and the amount and the kind of human activities in public spaces. Different urban forms can have very different degrees of sustainability. Density is one of the urban form elements that have been research numerous times and proven to have an influence on the neighbourhood sustainability. Density is the most easily measured urban form element either at a macro level (city) or micro level (neighbourhood). This research discusses the impact of density on the micro scale through estimating its influence on access to local facilities. Through the use of household survey and supported by observation survey, this study findings on the impact of density on access and use of local facilities. The study concludes with establishing the findings of the survey to reflect and fit into the body of knowledge and how it would improve the guidelines and policy on social sustainability in improving the urban living as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul R ahman N., Omar, D., and Salleh, A.G. (2012), Determinant Factors of Neighbourhood Quality , Planning Malaysia Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, Volume X (2012), Page 1 - 16.

Barton, H and Tsourou, C., (2000), Healthy Urban Planning. London, Spon and Copenhagen.

Barton, H., Guise, R., & Grant, M. (2010). Shaping neighbourhoods: for local health and global sustainability : Routledge.

Bramley, G. and K. Kirk (2005). "Does planning make a difference to urban form? Recent evidence from Central Scotland." Environment Planning AVolume 37:pp.355 - 378.

Bramley, G., N. Dempsey, et al. (2009). "Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities." Environment and Planning A 41(9):pp.2125 - 2142.

Bramley, G. and S. Power (2009). "Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36 (1): pp.30 - 48.

Bramley, G., Brown, C., Dempsey, N., Power, S., & Watkins, D. (2008). Social Acceptability. In Sustainable City Form ,pp. 105 - 128.

Bunnell, T., Barter, P. A., & Morshidi, S. (2002). Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area - A globalizing city - region. Cities,Volume 19, Issue 5, pp.357 – 370

Burgess, R (2000). The Compact City Debate: A Global Perspective, in Jenks, M. and Burgess, R.(20 00). Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries , Spon Press, Great Britain.

Burton, E., (2003). Housing for an Urban Renaissance: Implications for Social Equity. Housing Studies , 18(4), p.537 - 562.

Dempsey, N., Bramley G., and Brown C. (2012). The key to sustainable urban form in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in Planning (77). Elsevier, pp. 89 - 141.

Dempsey, N., Bramley G., Power S. and Brown C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable dev elopment: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development , 19(5), pp.289 - 300.

Dempsey, N. et al., (2010). Elements of Urban Form. In M. Jenks & C. Jones,eds. Sustainable City Form . Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 21 - 51.

Federal Department of Town and Country Planning, Peninsular Malaysia (2006), National Urbanisation Policy, Ministry of Housing and Local Government, August 2006.

Government of Malaysia (2005), National Physical Plan (NPP). Jabareen, Y.R., 2006. Sustainable Urban Forms. Journal of Planning Education and Research , pp.38 - 52.

Jenks, M., Jones, C., Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Raman, S., Porta, S., et al. (2010). Elements of Urban Form. in Dimensions of the Sustainable City (Vol. 2, pp. 21 - 51): Springer Netherlands.

Jenks, M., B urton, E. and Williams, K. (eds) (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? E & FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman and Hall, London.

Jones, C., (2009). Dimensions of the Sustainable City , Springer.

Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with NUS Press and NIAS Press.

Kuala Lumpur City Hall. (2004) Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020.

Kuala Lumpur City Hall. (2008) Local Plan, Kuala Lumpur 2020 City Plan.

Lin, J. J., & Yang, A. T. (2006). Does the compact - city paradigm foster sustainability ? An empirical study in Taiwan. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33 (3), 365 - 380.

Lotfi, S., & Koohsari, M. J. (2009). Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities, 26 (3), pp. 133 - 140.

Malaysia, 2010. Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011 - 2015.

Malaysia, 2005. Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006 - 2010.

Newman, P. and J. Kenworthy. 1999. Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Porta S (2001) .Quantifying the contribution of form to urban (social) sustainability, Paper presented in Conference Australia: Walking the 21 st Century, 20 th to 22 nd February 2001, Perth Australia.

Richardson H.W., Christine Bae, C.H and Baxamusa, M. (2000) Compact Cities in Developing Countries: Assessment and Implications in Burgess R. and Jenks, M. (2000), Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Form for Developing Countries , Spon Press, Great Britain.

Rokicka, E. and W. Warzywoda - Kruszyńska (2006). Social Just ice and Social Inequalities — Analysis of the Public Discourse in Poland. Soziale Gerechtigkeit : 285 - 301.

Talen, E. (2008). New Urbanism, Social Equity, and the Challenge of Post - Katrina Rebuilding in Mississippi. Journal of Planning Education and Research , pp.277 - 293.

Talen, E. (1999). Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 1361 - 1379

Towers, G. (2005). An introduction to urban housing design: at home in the city : Arc hitectural Press.

Williams K. (2000). Does intensifying cities make them more sustainable ? in Williams, K, Burton E& Jenks, M. (Eds) Achieving sustainable urban form, (London: E & FN Spon).

Williams K., Burton E., and Jenks M. (Eds) (2000). Achieving sustai nable urban form, (London: E & FN Spon).

Downloads

Published

2014-11-30

How to Cite

Wan Mohd Rani, W. N. M. (2014). EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF DENSITY ON ACCESS TO LOCAL FACILITIES IN URBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v12i4.122

Most read articles by the same author(s)