PUBLIC ART AS A CATALYST FOR CULTURAL REVITALIZATION AND TOURISM IN SMALL TOWNS: A CASE STUDY OF PEKAN PARIT, PERAK

Authors

  • Nur Ayuni Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Muhamad Ferdhaus Sazali Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Mohamad Azal Fikri Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Hasnizam Ab Dulhamid Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Rezza Petra Azlan Department of Anthropology, DURHAM UNIVERSITY, UNITED KINGDOM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1868

Keywords:

Public Art, Cultural Tourism, Community Engagement

Abstract

This study investigates the transformative role of public art in promoting tourism and fostering community engagement in Pekan Parit, Perak. Adopting a mixed-methods approach combining surveys and site observations, the research reveals that 88.3% of residents perceive murals, sculptures, and installations as valuable in preserving cultural identity and attracting visitors. However, challenges such as inadequate maintenance and a lack of thematic alignment with local heritage remain significant. Beyond aesthetic value, public art emerges as a conduit for expressing collective memory, identity, and cultural narratives embedded in everyday life. The findings highlight the importance of cultural relevance and active community participation in the artistic process. To support sustainable implementation, the study proposes an integrated framework encompassing community co-creation, systematic maintenance strategies, and curated tourism initiatives. These insights contribute to broader discourses on creative place making and sustainable cultural tourism, offering practical implications for policymakers and urban planners engaged in small-town revitalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cartiere, C., & Willis, S. (2008). The Practice of Public Art. Routledge.

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings, and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Eshun, G., & Madge, C. (2012). Sustainable Tourism in Africa: Approaches, Experiences, and Prospects. University of South Africa.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Evans, G. (2005). Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance? Routledge.

Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107102

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th ed.). Routledge.

Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 222–237). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Hunting, M. (2005). Art in Public: What, why, and how. Random House.

Ibrahim, A., Abdullah, R., -, W. N. J., Tun Ismail, W. N. A., & Olaitan, A. (2023). Strategy Formulation to Empower Indigenous Community Involvement in Cultural Ecological Tourism of Kuala Tahan National Part. Planning Malaysia, 21(25). Https://Doi.Org/10.21837/Pm.V21i25.1222

Jasmi, K. A., & Mohamad, S. S. (2016). The impact of adaptive reuse on historical buildings. Journal of Urban Heritage, 12(3), 320-335.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)

Mathews, G. (2014). Public art in urban transformation. Urban Studies Journal, 51(6), 1153-1166.

McCarthy, J. (2006). Regeneration of Urban Areas through Cultural Investment. Urban Studies Press.

Miles, M. (1997). Art, Space, and the city: Public Art and Urban Futures. Routledge.

Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business Press.

Richards, G. (2018). Cultural Tourism: Global and Local Perspectives (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2005). Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 1001–1023.

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.

Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.

Zakariya, K., & Azhari, S. (2017). Eco Public Art Placemaking Framework: A Case Study of Laman Seni Shah Alam, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 15(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.21837/Pm.V15i4.320

Zebracki, M. (2012). The impact of public art on urban spaces and communities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 480-491.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Nur Ayuni, Sazali, M. F., Fikri, M. A., Ab Dulhamid, H., & Azlan, R. P. (2025). PUBLIC ART AS A CATALYST FOR CULTURAL REVITALIZATION AND TOURISM IN SMALL TOWNS: A CASE STUDY OF PEKAN PARIT, PERAK. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1868