LOW-CARBON ADOPTION IN JOHOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Fara Diva Mustapa Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Farah Kamilah Zainuddin Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Tantish Kamaruddin Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Nur Hajarul Falahi Abdul Halim Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Saidin Misnan Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1519

Keywords:

Low-Carbon Adoption, Development Cost Implications, Gross Development Costs, Housing Development, Malaysia

Abstract

Construction activities have been identified as one of the sectors that contribute to high gas emissions, which inspires low-carbon housing development. This paper discusses the adoption of low-carbon design/features in Johor housing development and its cost implications. Five landed and high-rise housing case studies were gathered and analysed from both expert interviews and document analysis. Findings indicate that landed housing exerted more low-carbon design/features than high-rise housing due to design economics implications with an additional cost of 17.5% for high-rise and 10% for landed. The hard costs accounted for 83.5% of high-rise projects and 66% of landed ones, while the soft costs accounted for 16% of high-rise projects and 27% of landed ones. The remaining land costs depend on the developer's land bank and the land's book value. In conclusion, despite the higher development costs, low-carbon design/features adoption is worth considering for a more sustainable housing development in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab. Azis, S.S. (2021). Improving present-day energy savings among the green building sector in Malaysia using the benefit transfer approach: Cooling and lighting loads, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 137, 110570, ISSN 1364-0321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110570

Achini Shanika Weerainghe, T. R. (2017). Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Green Vs Conventional Buildings In Sri Lanka.

Boon Et Al. (2018). Housing Affordability in Malaysia: Perception, Price Range, Influencing Factors and Policies.

British Assessment Bureau. (2021). How Much Does Sustainable Building Construction Cost?

Chang, Wei. (2021). Chapter 9 - The utilization of renewable energy for low-carbon buildings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820539-6.00009-1

Chengchao Lv, Changhua Shao, Chien-Chiang Lee. (2021). Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Economics, Volume 98, 105237, ISSN 0140-9883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237

Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. (2021). Cost of Doing Business and Impact on Construction Industry.

Fawzy, S., Osman, A.I., Doran, J. et al. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18, 2069–2094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w

Gammage. (2022). Are Sustainable Products Expensive?

Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. (2020).

Green Building Index. (2013).

Green Building Index. (2022).

Gustafson. (2021). What Is Low-Carbon Development for Design and Construction?

KPMG. (2021). KPMG: Malaysia Ranked Among the Most Prepared and Able Countries to Achieve Net Zero Ambition.

Lawrence, R. J. (2020). Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Sustainable Development Goals: Human Ecology Matters. Human Ecology Review, 26(1), 95–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.26.01.2020.08

Luay N. Dwaikat, Kherun N. Ali. (2018). Green buildings life cycle cost analysis and life cycle budget development: Practical applications, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 18, Pages 303-311, ISSN 2352-7102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.015

Megan Keup. (2022). Hard Costs Vs. Soft Costs In Construction: Definitions & Examples.

Ministry Of Environment and Water (KASA). (2021). National Low-carbon Cities Masterplan.

Ministry Of Finance Malaysia. (2021). Malaysia Stepping Up Efforts to Transition to Low-Carbon, Climate-Resilient Economy -- Tengku Zafrul.

Muhamad Halil, F., Hasim, M. S., Kamaruddin, S. M., Mat Nasir, N., & Ismail, H. (2022). TORNADO FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT COST ANALYSIS FOR GREEN PROJECT IN MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i20.1085

Naief A. Aldossary, Yacine Rezgui, Alan Kwan. (2015). Consensus-based low-carbon domestic design framework for sustainable homes, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 51, Pages 417-432, ISSN 1364-0321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.070

National Institute of Valuation (INSPEN). (2023). Property Development Costs: A Cost-Effectiveness Study to Apprehend Unaffordable Housing Crisis. 17th Naprec Conference, 43–70.

Neenu. (2022). What Are Hard Costs in Construction?

Ramli, S. A., Yunus, J., Mohd Nordin, R., Hassan, P., & Mohd Tajul Hasnan, M. T. I. (2023). AUSPICIOUS GREEN RETROFIT STRATEGIES IN TWO-STORY TERRACE HOUSES: CASE STUDY OF PETALING JAYA SELANGOR MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(26). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1256

Saltler. (2020). Land Costs: Everything You Need to Know.

Sollar Et Al. (2022). Analysis Of BIM-Based Digitising of Green Building Index (GBI): Assessment Method. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040429

Srivastav. (N.D.). Hard Cost Vs. Soft Cost.

Thompson. (2022). Hard Costs Vs. Soft Costs: Definitions and Differences.

United Nations. (2022). For A Livable Climate: Net-Zero Commitments Must Be Backed by Credible Action.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). Climate Change Indicators: Greenhouse Gases.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Mustapa, F. D., Zainuddin, F. K., Kamaruddin, T., Abdul Halim, N. H. F., & Misnan, M. S. (2024). LOW-CARBON ADOPTION IN JOHOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(32). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1519