EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF HEALTHY CITY INDICATORS AND SATISFACTION LEVELS TOWARDS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SHAPING A HEALTHY CITY

Authors

  • Noor Hashimah Hashim Lim Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Liyana Hasnan Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Nurdiyana Zainal Abidin Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Md. Shahariar Chowdhury Dept. of Sustainable Energy, Faculty of Environmental Management, PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY
  • Nurul Azlia Shazreen Abdul Jalil Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Linda Shafarina Hassan Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1380

Keywords:

Healthy city, public participation, public perception, Urban governance, Local government

Abstract

This study explores the correlation between the perceived importance of healthy city indicators and the satisfaction level towards the effectiveness of the government in creating a healthy city environment. Nineteen distinct healthy city indicators, categorised within 5 dimensions, were tested for their significance in relation to satisfaction levels towards the effectiveness of the local authority. The cross-sectional data collected from face-to-face questionnaire survey was analysed using Goodman and Kruskal's gamma, while controlling for socio-demographic variables (n=121). Significant indicators include; (i) improving accessibility to public spaces (β= .528, p= .004), recreational and commercial areas (β= .506, p= .001); (ii) increasing the availability of public transport (β= .398, p= .026) complemented by proper infrastructures and facilities (β= .305, p= .014), (iii) providing more variety of green spaces (β= .529, p= .004), and improving the continuity of green networks (β= .399, p= .015); (iv) introducing measures to improve the quality of housing, focusing on increasing occupants’ comfortability and healthy living (β= .474, p= .005); (v) facilitating better accessibility to business and commercial areas (β= .598, p= .000); (vi) improving street connectivity and increasing the number of intersections (β= .418, p= .002). Although this study only found a meaningful connection between the perceived importance of indicators and satisfaction levels towards the government without a comparative analysis against the current city condition, this does not negate the crucial role of subjective perceptions in the government’s efforts to manage public expectations. Studies of this nature provide opportunities for further exploration, particularly in involving public participation in the planning processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews, M. (2018). Public Policy Failure: ‘How Often?’and ‘What is Failure, Anyway’? CID Working Paper Series.

Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2013). Urban planning for healthy cities: A review of the progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme. Journal of urban health, 90, 129-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3

Boarin, P., Besen, P., & Haarhoff, E. (2018). Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Neighbourhoods: a review of the literature. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010016857

Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.

Corburn, J. (2009). Toward the healthy city. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7583.001.0001

Curry, L. (2005). The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Generations Journal, 29(2), 82.

De Leeuw, E. (2009). Evidence for Healthy Cities: reflections on practice, method and theory. Health promotion international, 24(suppl_1), i19-i36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap052

De Leeuw, E., Green, G., Dyakova, M., Spanswick, L., & Palmer, N. (2015). European Healthy Cities evaluation: conceptual framework and methodology. Health promotion international, 30(suppl_1), i8-i17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav036

De Leeuw, E., & Simos, J. (Eds.). (2017). Healthy cities: the theory, policy, and practice of value-based urban planning. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6694-3

Department of Statistics Malaysia (2022). https://dev.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/current-population-estimates-malaysia-2022

Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2), 117-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001

Gehl, J. (2011). “Three Types of Outdoor Activities,”“Life Between Buildings,” and “Outdoor Activities and the Quality of Outdoor Space”: from Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1987). In The city reader (pp. 586-608). Routledge.

Giles-Corti, W., Ryan, K., & Foster, S. (2012). Increasing density in Australia: maximising the health benefits and minimising the harm. The National Heart Foundation of Australia.

Giles-Corti, B., Moudon, A. V., Lowe, M., Adlakha, D., Cerin, E., Boeing, G., ... & Sallis, J. F. (2022). Creating healthy and sustainable cities: what gets measured, gets done. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), e782-e785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00070-5

Grant, M. (2019). Planning for healthy cities. Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning: A Framework, 221-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_12

Hamilton, I., Milner, J., Chalabi, Z., Das, P., Jones, B., Shrubsole, C., ... & Wilkinson, P. (2015). Health effects of home energy efficiency interventions in England: a modelling study. BMJ open, 5(4), e007298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007298

Han, Y., Yang, L., Jia, K., Li, J., Feng, S., Chen, W., Zhao, W. & Pereira, P. (2020). Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the COVID-19 in Beijing and its Relationship with Environmental Factors. Science of The Total Environment, 761, 144257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144257

Harpham, T., Burton, S., & Blue, I. (2001). Healthy city projects in developing countries: the first evaluation. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 111-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.111

Hashim, N.H.N. (2021). A Framework for Sustainable Urban Regeneration (SUR) in Historical Inner Cities: The Case of KL Sentral. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Jia, P., Zou, Y., Wu, Z., Zhang, D., Wu, T., Smith, M., & Xiao, Q. (2021). Street connectivity, physical activity, and childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity Reviews, 22, e12943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12943

Leh, O. L. H., Ahmad, S., Aiyub, K., & Jani, Y. M. (2011). Urban air environmental health indicators: A preliminary set for city of Kuala Lumpur. Planning Malaysia, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v9i2.86

Li, T., Fang, Y., Zeng, D., Shi, Z., Sharma, M., Zeng, H., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Developing an indicator system for a healthy City: Taking an urban area as a pilot. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S233483

Lowe, M., Boulange, C., & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban design and health: progress to date and future challenges. Health promotion journal of Australia, 25(1), 14-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13072

Luo, J., Chan, E. H., Du, J., Feng, L., Jiang, P., & Xu, Y. (2022). Developing a health-spatial indicator system for a healthy city in small and midsized cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063294

Majid, M. R., Lim, N. H. H., Zaman, M., & Ruslik, N. (2021). Exploring the Link between BMI, Perceived Neighbourhood Environment and Health Behaviours in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16(7), 190-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2021.10.015

Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., ... & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental research, 158, 301-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028

McLean, E. V., & Roblyer, D. A. (2017). Public support for economic sanctions: An experimental analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(1), 233-254.

Meng, L. L., Abdullah, A., Fern, T. S., Badarulzaman, N., & Hassan, A. S. (2006). How we failed to plan for habitability. Planning Malaysia, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v4i1.50

Moseley, D., Marzano, M., Chetcuti, J., & Watts, K. (2013). Green networks for people: Application of a functional approach to support the planning and management of greenspace. Landscape and urban planning, 116, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.004

Mueller, N., Daher, C., Rojas-Rueda, D., Delgado, L., Vicioso, H., Gascon, M., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2021). Integrating health indicators into urban and transport planning: A narrative literature review and participatory process. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 235, 113772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113772

Nijkamp, J. E., & Mobach, M. P. (2020). Developing healthy cities with urban facility management. Facilities, 38(11/12), 819-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2019-0128

Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2021). Green infrastructure and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 317-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102511

Northridge, M. E., & Sclar, E. (2003). A joint urban planning and public health framework: contributions to health impact assessment. American journal of public health, 93(1), 118-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.1.118

Paquet, C., Cargo, M., Kestens, Y., & Daniel, M. (2010). Reliability of an instrument for direct observation of urban neighbourhoods. Landscape and urban planning, 97(3), 194-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.001

Pouso, S., Borja, Á., Fleming, L. E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., White, M. P., & Uyarra, M. C. (2021). Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. Science of The Total Environment, 756, 143984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143984

Powell, L. M., Chaloupka, F. J., Slater, S. J., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (2007). The availability of local-area commercial physical activity–related facilities and physical activity among adolescents. American journal of preventive medicine, 33(4), S292-S300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.002

Pozoukidou, G., & Chatziyiannaki, Z. (2021). 15-Minute City: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia. Sustainability, 13(2), 928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020928

Rothenberg, R., Stauber, C., Weaver, S., Dai, D., Prasad, A., & Kano, M. (2015). Urban health indicators and indices—current status. BMC Public Health, 15, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1827-x

Roy, S. & Gosh, P. (2020). Factors Affecting COVID-19 Infected and Death Rates Inform Lockdown-related Policymaking. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0241165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241165

Sallis, J. F., & Glanz, K. (2009). Physical activity and food environments: solutions to the obesity epidemic. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 123-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00550.x

Teh, B.T., Gabriel Ling, H.T., Hashim Lim, N.H., & Leng P.C. (2022). Factors Determining COVID-19 Severity in Malaysia: From Social, Economic and Environment Perspectives. Planning Malaysia, 20(5), 328 – 339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i24.1209

Van Dyck, D., Cardon, G., Deforche, B., Owen, N., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2011). Relationships between neighborhood walkability and adults' physical activity: How important is residential self-selection?. Health & place, 17(4), 1011-1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.005

Van Oers, J. A., & Reelick, N. F. (1992). Quantitative indicators for a healthy city--the Rotterdam local health information system. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 46(3), 293-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.46.3.293

Visscher, H., Meijer, F., Majcen, D., & Itard, L. (2016). Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information, 44(5-6), 552-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1180808

Webster, P., & Sanderson, D. (2013). Healthy cities indicators—a suitable instrument to measure health?. Journal of Urban Health, 90, 52-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9643-9

Wilmoth, M. J., Menozzi, M. C., & Bassarsky, M. L. (2022). Why population growth matters for sustainable development. Department of Economics and Social Affairs, United Nations.

World Health Organization. (2016). Health as the pulse of the new urban agenda: United Nations conference on housing and sustainable urban development, Quito, October 2016.

Zyed, Z. A. S., Tedong, P. A., Wan Abd Aziz, W. N. A., & Hanif, N. R. (2021). Governing Housing Affordability Problems among Younger Working Households. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, Special Issue 12(1), 118–128.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Hashim Lim, N. H., Hasnan, L., Zainal Abidin, N., Chowdhury, M. S., Abdul Jalil, N. A. S., & Hassan, L. S. (2023). EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF HEALTHY CITY INDICATORS AND SATISFACTION LEVELS TOWARDS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SHAPING A HEALTHY CITY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(29). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1380