DIFFERENTIAL URBANISATION IN MALAYSIA, 1980-2010

Authors

  • Muhammad Hakim Danial Centre of Studies for Town and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, UiTM PUNCAK ALAM MALAYSIA
  • Paul Williamson Department of Geography and Planning, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL, UNITED KINGDOM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i23.1158

Keywords:

Urbanisation, internal migration, population, city stages, developing country

Abstract

In the early 1970s, urbanisation shifted towards counterurbanisation in most developed countries. In contrast, there is little evidence that developing countries will experience counterurbanisation due to the complexity of their historical, economic, and social conditions. To examine the transition process, Geyer and Kontuly (1993) introduced differential urbanisation theory to explain the concentration and deconcentration of populations in urban systems (from urbanisation to polarisation reversal to counterurbanisation). Most studies have applied this theory in developed country settings, but few have done so for developing countries and none have done so in the Malaysian context. This paper tested the theory in the Malaysian setting to consider the extent to which the theoretical assumptions are supported or challenged. In addition, compared to previous papers, this paper focuses far more on the nature of migration flows leading to urbanisation in terms of the relative contributions of net migration and natural increase to population change, as well as origin-destination migration flows in total and according to age structures. The results show that natural increase, rather than migration flows, was the dominant cause of urbanisation in all settlement types. This was due to the population momentum effect of high fertility levels, primarily after the Second World War, which resulted in the birth of a large number of females who later grew to childbearing age. Malaysia experienced the second stage of urbanisation (Intermediate Primate City) after 1980 but had shifted towards the final stage (Advanced Primate City) by 2000. This analysis of three decades (1980-2010), however, shows clear evidence of urbanisation but no evidence of polarisation reversal or counterurbanisation. Due to the continuous rapid urban development and growth in the largest city, the capital metropolitan area, and if the current migration trends persist in the future, Malaysia may never experience polarisation reversal or counterurbanisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, J. (2003). The Suburbanisation of the Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Region. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners.

Allan, R, Kulu, H & Williamson, P. (2017) Unravelling urban-rural health disparities in England. Population, Space and Place, 23(8), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2073

Andreev, Kirill; Kantorová, Vladimíra; Bongaarts, J. (2013). Demographic Components of Future Population Growth. UN Technical Paper Series, (3), 26. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952446.n605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952446.n605

Argent, N., & Rolley, F. (2008). Counterurbanisation in Australia: Two Case Studies. Geodate, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-9

Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Edwards, E. C. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00671.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00671.x

Berry, B. J. L. (1980). Urbanization and Counterurbanization in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Changing Cities: A Challenge to Planning, 451, 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271628045100103

Blue, L., & Espenshade, T. J. (2011). Population momentum across the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 37(4), 721–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00454.x

Bonifazi, C., & Heins, F. (2003). Testing the differential urbanisation model for Italy. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 94(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00234

Champion, T. (2003). Testing the differential urbanisation model in Great Britain, 1901-91. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 94(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00233

Coombes, M., Longa, R. D., & Raybould, S. (1989). Counterubanisation in Britain and Italy : A Comparative Critique of the Concept , Causation and Evidence. Progress in Planning, 32, 1–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(89)90009-3

Department of Statistics Malaysia (2021). Vital Statistics, Malaysia, 2021. Retrieved November 4, 2021 from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=165&bul_id=UDlnQ05GMittVXJWZUVDYUFDcjVTZz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09

Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur. (2003). Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020 : Economic Base and Population. Retrieved June 4, 2018, from

http://www.dbkl.gov.my/pskl2020/english/economic_base_and_population/index.htm

Dyson, T. (2010) Population and Development, London: Zed Books. Federal Department of Town and Country Planning Peninsular Malaysia. (2016). The Second National Urbanisation Policy.

Gedik, A. (2003). Differential urbanization in Turkey: 1955-2000. In 43rd Congress of The European Regional Science Association (pp. 1–17). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00240

Geyer, H. S. (2003). Differential urbanisation in South Africa - a further exploration. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 94(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00239

Geyer, H. S., & Kontuly, T. (1993). A Theoretical Foundation for the Concept of Differential Urbanization. International Regional Science Review, 15(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769301500202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769301500202

Geyer Jr, H. S., & Geyer, H. S. (2015). Disaggregated Population Migration Trends in South Africa Between 1996 and 2011: a Differential Urbanisation Approach. Urban Forum, 26, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9229-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9229-1

Gwebu, T. D. (2006). Towards a theoretical exploration of the differential urbanisation model in Sub-Saraharan Africa: The Botswana case. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 97(4), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00346.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00346.x

Halliday, J., & Coombes, M. (1995). In search of counterurbanisation: Some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1

Hasan, A. R., & Nair, P. L. (2014). Urbanisation and growth of metropolitan centres in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 51(1), 87–101.

Heikkila, E. (2003). Differential urbanisation in Finland. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 94(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236

Hirschman, C. (1980). Demographic Trends in Peninsular Malaysia, 1947-75. Population and Development Review, 6(1), 103–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1972660

Hosszú, S. (2009). Counterurbanization A literature study. University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg.

Jain, M., Siedentop, S., Taubenbock, H., & Namperumal, S. (2013). From Suburbanization to Counterurbanization? Investigating Urban Dynamics in the National Capital Region Delhi, India. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 4(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425313510765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425313510765

Jedwab, R., Christianesen, L., & Gindelsky, M. (2014). Demography, Urbanization and Development: Rural Push, Urban Pull and Urban Push? DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7333

Kontuly, T., & Dearden, B. (2003). Testing the temporal characterisation of the differential urbanisation model in Western Germany, 1939-2010. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 94(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00237

Kontuly, T., & Vogelsang, R. (1988). Explanations for the intensification of counterurbanization in the federal republic of germany. Professional Geographer, 40(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00042.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00042.x

Lerch, M. (2019) Regional variations in the rural-urban fertility gradient in the global South. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0219624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219624

Lestari. (1997). Urbanization and Environment in Malaysia: Managing the Impact

Mookherjee, D. (2003). Differential urbanisation model: the case of a developing country, India 1961-91. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 94(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00235

Mookherjee, D., & Geyer, M. H. S. (2011). Urban Growth in the National Capital Region of India: Testing the Differential Urbanisation Model. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 102(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00599.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00599.x

Nefedova, T., & Treivish, A. (2003). Differential Urbanisation in Russia. Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, 94(1), 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00238

Osman, S., Abdullah, J., & Nawawi, A. H. (2017). The financial costs of urban sprawl: Case study of Penang State. Planning Malaysia, 15(6), 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i2.265

Sander, N. (2014). Internal Migration in Germany, 1995-2010: New Insights into EastWest Migration and Re-urbanisation. Comparative Population Studies, 39(2), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2014-04en DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2014-04

Seto, K. C. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of migration to mega-delta cities in Asia and Africa: Contemporary drivers and future scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 21(SUPPL. 1), S94–S107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.005

Tammaru, T., Kulu, H., & Kask, I. (2004). Urbanization, Suburbanization, and Counterurbanization in Estonia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.45.3.212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.45.3.212

Yaakob, U., Masron, T., & Masami, F. (2010). Ninety Years of Urbanization in Malaysia: A Geographical Investigation of Its Trends and Characteristics. Journal of Ritsumeikan Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 79–101.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Danial, M. H., & Williamson, P. (2022). DIFFERENTIAL URBANISATION IN MALAYSIA, 1980-2010. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(23). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i23.1158