MONITORING THE PERFORMANCE OF STATE STRUCTURE PLAN IN DELIVERING OUTPUT USING DYNAMIC MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i4.174Keywords:
plan monitoring, plan performance, dynamic modelAbstract
Plan outputs are the material objects that are tangible and provided as a result of the implementation of a development plan. They often act as precursor to achieving plan outcomes. Therefore, it is important to monitor the performance of plan in delivering its outputs so that the prospect of achieving its outcomes remains high. However, present state structure plan monitoring programmes focus mostly on monitoring land use change and not plan output delivery. The absence of output monitoring reduces the usefulness of the programmes and contributes to under-provision of outputs, especially public facilities and open spaces. This study proposes that state structure plan monitoring programmes must include mechanism to monitor the performance of the plan in delivering plan outputs. To this end, a dynamic model for monitoring performance of state structure plan in delivering open spaces was developed using STELLA software and applied on the Selangor State Structure Plan. The model simulation showed that the Selangor State Structure Plan has performed poorly in delivering the open spaces where their provision has not conform to the plan’s targets. The model simulations also show that this nonconformances will remain by the end of the plan’s planning period.Downloads
References
Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin, Mohd Nuruddin Abdul Kadir, & Susilawati Sulaiman. (2009). Monitoring local plan compliance through land use monitoring system . Paper presented at the 11th International Conference o n Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Hong Kong.
Ahris Yaakup. (2004). GIS as a tool for development planning and monitoring . Paper presented at the NGIS 2004, Kuala Lumpur. http://eprints.utm.my/627 /
Ahris Yaakup, Siti Zalina Abu Bakar, & Susilawati Sulaiman. (2009). Decision support systems for urban sustainability in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 10 (1), 101 - 118.
Alterman, R., Carmon, N., & Hill, M. (1984). Integrated ev aluation: A synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad - aim social programs. Socio - Economic Planning Sciences, 18 (6), 381 - 389.
Barret, S. (2004). Implementation studies: time for a revival? Public Administration, 82 (2), 249 - 262.
Barret, S., & Fudge, C. (1981). Policy and action - essays in the implementation of public policy . London: Methuen.
Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, L., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2006). What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33 , 581 - 600.
Calkins, H. W. (1979). The planning monitor: an accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and Planning A, 11 (7), 745 - 758.
Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2008). Performance measurement in planning - towards a holistic view. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26 (2), 428 - 454.
Chapin, T., Deyle, R., & Baker, E. (2008). A parcel - based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land - use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35 , 261 - 279
Combe, C. (2008). Monitoring the conformance of planning decisions to urban land use policies using Inf ormation Extraction and GeoVisualisation. (PhD), Napier University, Edinburgh.
Davidson, J. E. (2000). Ascertaining causality in theory - based evaluation. In P. J. Rogers, A. J. Petrosino, T. Hacsi & T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory evaluation: chall enges and opportunities. (pp. 17 - 26). San Francisco: Jossey - Bass.
Deal, B., & Schunk, D. (2004). Spatial dynamic modeling and urban land use transformation: a simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl. Ecological Economics, 51 (1 - 2), 79 - 95.
Faludi, A. (2000, April 10 - 11, 2000). The performance of spatial planning. Paper presented at the Seminar on Spatial Development Policy and Territorial Governance in an Era of Globalisation and Localisation, Paris
Ford, A. (1999). Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems . Washington DC: Island Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1970). Systems Analysis as a Tool for Urban Planning. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 6 (4), 258 - 265.
Guhathakurta, S. (2002). Urban modeling as storytelling: using simulation models as a narrative. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 , 895 - 911.
Guo, H. C., Liu, L., Huang, G. H., Fuller, G. A., Zou, R., & Yin, Y. Y. (2001). A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: A study for the Lake Erhai Basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 61 (1), 93 - 111.
Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., & Imura, H. (2009). Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: A case study of Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91 (3), 133 - 141.
Hao, P., Sliuzas, R., Zhan, Q., & Geertman, S. (2009). Land use deviations from the plan: a GIS based analysis of urban development in Shenz en . Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Hong Kong.
Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Negeri Selangor. (2007). Rancangan Struktur Negeri Selangor 2020.
Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan D esa Perak Darul Ridzuan. (2008). Rancangan Struktur Negeri Perak 2020.
Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia. (2005). Garis panduan dan piawaian perancangan tanah lapang dan rekreasi . Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semenanjung Malaysia.
Kerajaan Negeri Pahang Darul Makmur. (2008). Rancangan Struktur Negeri .
Laurian, L., Crawford, J., Day, M., Kouwenhoven, P., Mason, G., Ericksen, N., & Beattie, L. (2010). Evaluating the outcomes of plans: theory, practice, and methodology. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 37 (4), 740 - 757.
Mastop, H., & Faludi, A. (1997). Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (6), 815 - 832.
Muhammad Faris Abdullah, Alias Abdullah, & Rustam Khairi Zahari. (2009). GIS application in monitoring development plan implementation in Malaysia: weaknesses and potential . Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Hong Kong.
Muhammad Faris Abdullah, Alias Abdullah, & Rustam Khairi Zahari. (2010). GIS implementation in Malaysian statutory development plan system. In C. N. Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research on e - planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring (pp. 435 - 454). New York: IGI Global.
Ortolano, L., & Perman, C. D. (1990). Applications to urban planning: an overview. In T. J. Kim, L. L. Wiggins & J. R. Wright (Eds.), Expert systems: applications to urban planning (pp. 3 - 13). New York: Springer - Verlag.
Saeed, K. (20 02). System dynamics: a learning and problem solving approach to development policy. Global Business & Economic Review, 4 (1), 81 - 105.
Santos, S. P., Belton, V., & Howick, S. (2002). Adding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22 (11), 1246 - 1272.
Seasons, M. (2003). Monitoring and Evaluation in Municipal Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69 (4), 430 - 440.
Simmonds, D. C. (1999 ). The design of the DELTA land - use modelling package. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 , 665 - 684.
Talen, E. (1997). Success, failure, and conformance: an alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (4), 573 - 587.
Tarmiji Masron. (2003). Ke arah pembangunan mapan: pembentukan petunjuk dan sistem sokongan perancangan (PSS) bagi pemantauan pelaksanaan rancangan pembangunan bandar. (Doctorate), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Tarmiji Masron, & Ruslan Rainis. (2004). Sistem sokongan perancangan (PSS): analisis aplikasi bagi sektor - sektor terpilih. Jurnal Teknologi, B (40), 41 - 66.
UGisP. (2006). GIS9: Pembangunan Pengkalan Data Sistem Maklumat Geografi Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus - Laporan Akhir Fasa III .
Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation . New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
