E-PAYMENT AT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEVEL: A STUDY OF MAJLIS BANDARAYA SHAH ALAM AND MAJLIS DAERAH KAMPAR

Authors

  • Rustam Khairi Zahari Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin Faculty of Economics and Administration UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Nurhawani Zamin Economic Planning Unit PRIME MINISTER'S DEPARTMENT
  • Noorzailawati Mohd Noor Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v12i3.130

Keywords:

Urban morphology, GIS, Remote sensing, urban planning, urban governance

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) adoption through the implementation of electronic government (e-Government) helps improves local authority‘s service delivery for the benefit of the community. Many of the local authorities have adopted the online payment method for the assessment rate collection. Despite the notion that e-Government increased productivity and improved efficiency, citizen‘s usage is still considered minimal and has been comparatively low especially in services involving transactional. This study investigates the factors influencing the usage of online payment method in local authority‘s assessment rate collection. Data for this study was collected through questionnaire, interview and document analysis. The findings showed that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, payment receipt issuance and income level seem to influence user‘s intention to adopt the online payment method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainul Jaria Maidin and Bashiran Begum Mobara k Ali. (2009). Powers of the Local Authority in Regulating Land Planning and Development Control: Wither Control. Planning Malaysia - Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners VII, 133 - 147.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organiza tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 , 179 - 211.

Akhter, S. (2003). Digital Divide and Purchase Intention: Why Demographic Psychology Matters. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24 (3), 321 - 327.

Akman, I., Yacizi, A., Mishra, A., & Arifoglu, A. (200 5). E - Government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22 (2), 239 - 257.

Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e - government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information S ystems, 17 (2), 165 - 176.

Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T. (2006). User - centered e - government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 23 (2), 163 - 168.

Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). The E - Government paradox: Better customer service doesn't necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly, 25 (2), 149 - 154.

Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e - government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15 (1), 5 - 25.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319 - 340.

Eastin, M. S. (2002). Diffusion of e - commerce: an analysis of the adoption of four e - commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics, 19 (3), 251 - 267.

Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister‘s Department. (2006). Ninth Malaysia Plan: 2006 - 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E - Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development . Government Information Quarterly, 23 (2), 207 - 235.

Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E - government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20 ( 4), 365 - 387.

He, F., & Mykytyn, P.P. (2007). Decision Factors for the Adoption of an Online Payment System by Customers. International Journal of E - Business Research, 3 (4), 1 - 32.

Helbig, N., Gil - Garcia, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complex ity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (1), 89 - 97.

Hung, S. - Y., Chang, C. - M., & Yu, T. - J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e - Government services: The case of online t ax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23 (1), 97 - 122.

Lai, L. T., & Rieck, O. (2005). Citizens as customers: Exploring the future of CRM in UK local government. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14 (4), 417 - 440.

Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2002). Internet - based e - banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information & Management, 39 (4), 283 - 295.

Maizatul Haizan Mahbob, Mohammed Zin Nordin, Ali Salman, Wan Idros Wan Sulaiman, & Mohd. Yusof Hj. Abdullah. (2011). Government to Citizen: Advocacy of Government On - line Systems and Their Acceptance among Citizens. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16 (3), 1 - 13.

Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU), Prime Mini ster‘s Department. (1997). Electronic Government Flagship Application: Blueprint for Electronic Government Implementation. Kuala Lumpur: Government of Malaysia.

Maniam Kaliannan, & Halimah Awang. (2008). Implementing Electronic Procurement in Government: A Case Study on e - Perolehan in Malaysia. Public Sector ICT Management Review, 2 (1), 44 - 51.

Ndou, V. (2004). E - Government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18 (1), 1 - 24.

Norhaslina Hassan, Noor Ismawati Mohd. Jaafar, Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin, Asmarulkhadi Abu Samag & Mohd. Nazari Jaafar. (2013). Perceptions on Quality of Life in Malaysia: The Urban - Rural Divide. Planning Malaysia - Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners XI, 21 - 40.

Ooh, K.L., Suhaiza Zailani, T. Ramayah, & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e - government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal Of Information Management, 29 (6), 458 - 475.

Pavlou, P. A. (20 03). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7 (3), 69 - 103.

Poon, W. - C. (2008). Users‘ adoption of e - banking services: the Malaysian perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23 (1), 59 - 69.

Ramlah Hussein, Nor Shahriza Abdul Karim, Norshidah Mohamed, & Abdul Rahman Ahlan. (2007). The Influence of Organizational Factors on Information Systems Success in E - Government Agencies in Malaysia. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 29 (1), 1 - 17.

Ramlah Hussein, Norshidah Mohamed, Abd Rahman Ahlan, & Murni Mahmud. (2011). E - government application: an integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5 (3), 225 - 248.

Reddick, C. G., & Turner, M. (2012). Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: Comparing e - government to traditional service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (1), 1 - 11.

Rhee, K. Y. & Kim, W. - B. (2004). The Adoption and Use of the Internet in South Korea. Journal of Computer - Mediated Communication, 9 (4).

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5 th Ed.). New York: Free Press.

Sandoval - Almazan, R., & Gil - Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e - government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (s1), S72 - S78.

Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e - Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28 (1) , 17 - 35.

Shyu, S.H - P., & Huang, J - H. (2011). Elucidating usage of e - government learning: A perspective of the extende d technology acceptance model. Government Information Quarterly, 28 (4), 491 - 502.

Siddique, N.A. (2008). Service delivery innovations and governance: the Malaysian experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2 (3), 194 - 213.

Sung - mi, K. (2012, March 8). South Korea‘s e - Government Development amazes the World in Winning UN e - Government Survey 2012. Korea IT Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreaittimes.com/

United Nations. (2003). UN Global E - Government Survey 2003. New York: United Nation s. United Nations. (2005). UN Global E - Government Readiness Report 2005: From E - Government to E - Inclusion. New York: United Nations.

United Nations. (2012). E - Government Survey 2012: E - Government for the People. New York:

United Nations. Venkatesh, V., Cha n, F. K. Y., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2012). Designing e - government services: Key service attributes and citizens‘ preference structures. Journal of Operations Management, 30 (1 – 2), 116 - 133.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425 - 478.

Yu, H. - C., Hsi, K. - H., & Kuo, P. - J. (2002). Electronic payment systems: an analysis and comparison of types. Technology in Society, 24 (3), 331 - 347.

Yurita Yakimin A bdul Talib, Marlina Mohd Lazim, & Mohamad Sharofi Ismail. (2005). A Study on the Computerized Revenue Collection System of Local Authority: A Case of Perlis, Kedah and Penang (UUM Working Paper No. 11/2005). Kedah: Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-30

How to Cite

Zahari, R. K., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Zamin, N., & Mohd Noor, N. (2014). E-PAYMENT AT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEVEL: A STUDY OF MAJLIS BANDARAYA SHAH ALAM AND MAJLIS DAERAH KAMPAR. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v12i3.130

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.