EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAMME: A FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS (SABAK BERNAM DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN AND KUALA LUMPUR STRUCTURE PLAN)

Authors

  • Dasimah Omar Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Oliver Ling Hoon Leh Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v5i1.55

Keywords:

Public Participation, District Local Plan, Structure Plan, Effectiveness

Abstract

Nowadays, public awareness on the potential dangers of environmental problems and the negative impact from the development has been increasing. Public has the right to know and participate in making decisions, particularly in those have potentially affect on the communities in which they live and work. Furthermore, Malaysia is adopting the Rio Declaration - Sustainable Development and Agenda 21. One of the fundamental prerequisites for the achievement of sustainable development is broad public participation in decision-making. Research had been carried out to identify the effectiveness of the public participation programme for Sabak Bemam District Local Plan 2002-2015 and Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020. The research was carried out by collecting feedback from the participants of public exhibitions and workshops for both of the plans. Through the research, it was found that series of workshops are the effective method of public participation for development plan as compared to public exhibition after draft proposal of the plan has been completed. An effective and successful public participation programme should allow members of the community to have an active voice in the process and to have a free access to important information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books:

Conor, Desmond M. 1997. Constructive Citizen Participation: How to Prevent and Resolve Public Controversy. Connor Development Services Ltd: Canada.

Conor, Desmond M. 1999. Model Approaches for Public Participation. Connor Development Services Ltd: Canada.

Hunt D. and Johnson C. 1995. Environmental Management Systems - Principle and Practice. McGraw Hill Book Company: London.

Jones K. and Scholz A. 2003. “World Summit to the Movement - Do You Have a Pulse?â€in Earth Island Journal. EBSCO Publishing,

Karel van der Zwiep. 1994. “Public Participation as an Instrument for Environmental Protection†in Manual on Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making. Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe.

Laws of Malaysia. Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982 -Act 267.

Laws of Malaysia, 2002. Town and Countiy Planning Act 1976 (Act 172). International Law Book Services: Kuala Lumpur.

Nagy M. T. et al. 1994. Manual on Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making. Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe: Europe.

Ortolano L. 1984. Environmental Planning and Decision Making. Stanford University: Canada.

The Co-Intelligence Institute. 2002. Principles of Public Participation.

Internet:

Agenda 21 and the 1992 Earth Summit Agreements, http://habitat.igc.org.

Fundacion Ambientey Recursos Naturales. 2001. Access to Decision-Making Processes, www.fam.org.ar/docs/np/en nrocesos.html,

Fundacion Ambientey Recursos Naturales. 2001. Access to Public Information. www.fam.org.ar/docs/np/en information! .html.

United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. 2002. United Nations: Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. RCRA Public Participation Manual, www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/permit/pubpart/manual.htm.

Downloads

Published

2007-11-30

How to Cite

Omar, D., & Hoon Leh, O. L. (2007). EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAMME: A FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS (SABAK BERNAM DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN AND KUALA LUMPUR STRUCTURE PLAN). PLANNING MALAYSIA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v5i1.55

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>