USERS PREFERENCE AND PERCEPTION ON THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IN MALAYSIA: THE CASE OF AMPANG ROAD, KUALA LUMPUR

Authors

  • Oliver Ling Hoon Leh Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Zamila Zamri Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Mohd Zamreen Mohd Amin Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Marlyana Azyyati Marzukhi Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v11i3.109

Keywords:

Overhead crossing, Perception study, Signalised crossing, Underpass crossing.

Abstract

The issue of road accident among pedestrian is highly emotional and raising a very strong interest within the public, and the media, mainly due to the victims are often children and elderly people. However, most of the pedestrians are lack in interest of using the pedestrian crossing. Thus, a study on the perception and preference of the pedestrian on the pedestrian crossing was being carried out in Ampang Road, Kuala Lumpur as a case study. The objectives of the study are to analyze pedestrians’ preference and perception on the various types of pedestrian crossing and to conclude findings and construct strategic recommendation based on the findings. The study has been carried out on three (3) types of pedestrian crossing in Ampang Road which are overhead crossing, underpass crossing and signalised crossing. This study involved with questionnaire survey on the total of 92 respondents, and on-site observation by researcher. Statistical analysis has been carried out, i.e. the frequency, mean and percentage. There are three (3) major findings in this study. The most chosen type of pedestrian crossing is the overhead crossing. However, the underpass crossing was given the best score in term of the quality of the pedestrian crossing (based on the respondents’ perception). Meanwhile, the signalised crossing is the most preferable type of crossing. The reasons and the explanation were discussed in the paper. The study is concluded with strategic recommendation for pedestrian crossing planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Aziz Chik et al. (2000). Midblock Signalled Pedestrian Crossing - Alternative Controller Algorithm. Journal of the Civil Engineering 12 (1).

Akin, D. (2007). Pedestrian Crossing Compliance Characteristics At - Grade Signalized Crosswalks: Case Study in a Downtown University Campus Environment. Transportation Research Board 86 th Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.

Fitzpatrick, K., et al. (2006). Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transit Cooperative Research Program.

Jabatan Kerja Raya Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur (2013). Road Circulation Map.

Jabatan Perancangan Bandar & Desa Semenanjung Malaysia (2013). Map of Kuala Lumpur.

Ling, OHL, Ting, KH, Dasimah Omar , Jamalunlaili Abdullah, Tee, SF. (2010). Transit Oriented Neighbourhod for Better Environmental Health. 2010 International Conference on Science & Social Research (CSSR 2010) , 5 - 7 Dec. 2010, Kuala Lumpur.

Martin, A. (2006). Factors Influencing Pedestrian Safety: A Literature Review. Project Report PPR241. Final Version. TRL Limited.

Nik Ibtishamiah Ibrahim et al. (2005). Motorists and Pedestrian Interaction at Unsignalised Pedestrian Crossing. Journal of t he Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5: 120 - 125.

Norainah A. R., Dasimah O. & Abdul Ghani S. (2012). Determinant Factors of Neighbourhood Quality. Planning Malaysia 10 : 1 - 16.

Thambiah Muraleetharan (2005). Method to Determine Pedestrian Level - of - Service for Crosswalks at Urban Intersections. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies

Downloads

Published

2013-11-30

How to Cite

Hoon Leh, O. L., Zamri, Z., Mohd Amin, M. Z., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2013). USERS PREFERENCE AND PERCEPTION ON THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IN MALAYSIA: THE CASE OF AMPANG ROAD, KUALA LUMPUR. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v11i3.109

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>