NEIGHBOURHOOD QUALITY ASSESSMENT: A VIEW OF TENURE OWNERSHIP AND MOBILITY DECISIONS IN PENANG, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Hamizah Abdul Fattah School of Housing Building and Planning UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Nurwati Badarulzaman School of Housing Building and Planning UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Kausar Ali School of Housing Building and Planning UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.712

Keywords:

neighbourhood quality, residential mobility, mobility decision, tenure

Abstract

Most people have experienced a crucial moment of decision during their life course, that of whether to stay over or to move out of their house and neighbourhood. Residential mobility refers to mobility thoughts and intentions, as well as the actual moving behaviours among the residents, which are often triggered by feelings of dissatisfactions, state of disequilibrium or mismatch between the present housing needs and consumption, and the desired housing preferences. Residential mobility is postulated to be influenced by many factors, notably family life cycle (infant to elderly phase), tenure ownership (house owner or renter), housing profile (dwelling features) and quality of the neighbourhood. There is limited study on tenure ownership and factors of neighbourhood quality that can affect mobility decision and residential mobility behaviour. Hence, this study examines mobility decisions based on tenure ownership and neighbourhood quality including physical, social and economic attributes among residents of housing schemes in Penang Island, Malaysia. A questionnaire survey of 717 respondents living in low, medium and high cost housing in the study area revealed that dwelling features, neighbourhood facilities, environment, social interaction and attachment are the major considerations and preferences affecting residential mobility behaviours among residents. The study findings provide insights and guidance on planning for better neighbourhoods to satisfy residents’ needs and enhance quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarland, K., & Reid, C. K. (2018). Homeownership and residential stability: does tenure really make a difference? International Journal of Housing Policy, 1247, 1-27.

Boschman, S. (2018). Individual differences in the neighbourhood level determinants of residential satisfaction. Housing Studies, 33(7), 1127-1143.

Clark, W. A. V, Deurloo, M. & Dieleman, F. M. (2006). Residential Mobility and Neighbourhood Outcomes. Housing Studies, 21(3), 323-342.

Clark, W. A. V. & Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. Transaction Publishers.

Clark, W. A. V. & Huang, Y. (2003). The Life Course and Residential Mobility in British Housing Markets. Environment and Planning A, 35(2), 323-339.

Clark, W. A. V., Duque-Calvache, R. & Palomares-Linares, I. (2017). Place Attachment and the Decision to Stay in the Neighbourhood. Population, Space and Place, 23(2).

Coenen, A., Verhaeghe, P. P. & Van de Putte, B. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? The association between upward socio-economic neighbourhood change and moving propensities. Environment and Planning A, 50(2), 370-390.

de Groot, C., Mulder, C. H., Das, M. & Manting, D. (2011). Life Events and The Gap Between Intention to Move and Actual Mobility. Environment and Planning-Part A, 43(1), 48.

de Groot, C., Mulder, C. H. & Manting, D. (2011). Intentions to Move and Actual Moving Behaviour in The Netherlands. Housing Studies, 26(3), 307-328.

Ghasri, M. & Hossein Rashidi, T. (2018). Investigating how household’s decision on next tenure status affects residential relocation timing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(2), 385-408.

Hooimeijer, P. & Oskamp, A. (1996). A Simulation Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 313-336.

Kearns, A. & Parkes, A. (2003). Living In and Leaving Poor Neighbourhood Conditions in England. Housing Studies, 18(6), 827-851.

Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F. & Preston, J. (2005). The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behaviour. Urban Studies, 42(9), 1621-1636. Retrieved from

Kleinhans, R. & Elsinga, M. (2010). “Buy Your Home and Feel in Control” Does Home Ownership Achieve the Empowerment of Former Tenants of Social Housing? International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 41-61.

Lee, B.A., Oropesa, R.S. & Kanan, J. (1994). Neighbourhood Context and Residential Mobility. Demography, 31 (2), 249-270.

Liu, A. M. M. (1999). Residential Satisfaction in Housing Estates: A Hong Kong Perspective. Automation in Construction, 8(4), 511-524. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580598000983

Lu, M. (1999a). Determinants of Residential Satisfaction: Ordered Logit vs. Regression Models. Growth and Change, 30(2), 264-287. Retrieved from

Lu, M. (1999b). Do People Move When They Say They Will? Inconsistencies in Individual Migration Behavior 1, 20(5).

Mohamed Osman, M., Muhamad Yusup, S. W., Abdullah, M.F., Shuid, S. (2017). Housing affordability index for districts in Perak.Advanced Science Letters, 23 (7). pp. 6049-6052.

Mohamed Osman, M., Khalid, N., Muhammad Yusop, S. W. (2017). Housing affordability in the state of Selangor, Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23 (7). pp. 6188-6122.ISSN 1936-6612

Mulder, C.H. & Hooimeijer, P. (1999). Residential Relocation in a Life Course. In L.G. Wissen & P. Dykstra (Eds.), Population Issues (p. 159-186). Springer Netherlands.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual:A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. SPSS survival manual 4th ed (Vol. 494). Allen & Unwin.

Parkes, A. & Kearns, A. D. E. (2003). Residential Perceptions and Housing Mobility in Scotland: An Analysis of the Longitudinal Scottish House Condition Survey 199196. Housing Studies, 18(5), 673-701.

Petzold, K. (2017). Mobility experience and mobility decision-making: An experiment on permanent migration and residential multilocality. Population, Space and Place, 23(8), 1-14.

Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why Families Move: A study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. Free Press Glencoe.

Sissons, P. & Houston, D. (2018). Changes in transitions from private renting to homeownership in the context of rapidly rising house prices. Housing Studies, 3037, 1-17.

Tan, T. H. (2011). Neighbourhood Preferences of House Buyers: the Case of Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 4(1), 58-9.

van Eggermond, M.A.B. Erath, A. & Axhausen, K. W. (2018). Residential search and location choice in Singapore. In 2018 TRB Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers (pp. 18-01994). The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Woo, M. & Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2011). Main Factors Associated with Homeowners’ Intentions to Move. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 15(3), 161-186.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-08

How to Cite

Abdul Fattah, H., Badarulzaman, N., & Ali, K. (2020). NEIGHBOURHOOD QUALITY ASSESSMENT: A VIEW OF TENURE OWNERSHIP AND MOBILITY DECISIONS IN PENANG, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.712

Most read articles by the same author(s)