MEASURING PUBLIC ASSET PERFORMANCE USING OUTPUTBASED APPROACH: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA

Authors

  • Intan Puspitarini School of Financial Management POLYTECHNIC OF STATE FINANCE STAN
  • Muhammad Heru Akhmadi School of Financial Management POLYTECHNIC OF STATE FINANCE STAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i9.606

Keywords:

Public Assets, Performance of Public Asset, Output-Based, Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia’s Central Government 2016 Fiscal Year Financial Report shows that the proportion of the total value of public assets owned by the Central Government (known as State-Owned Assets/SOAs) was very significant to the total value of its asset in the balance sheet, which was 40%. While the total value of SOAs sat on IDR 2,200 trillion, the total asset in the balance sheet reached IDR 5,456.88 trillion. Such significant value of SOAs consequently requires the Indonesian government to develop an asset management strategy to effectively and efficiently manage SOA. The utilization of SOAs is one of the tools employed by the government to ensure that capital expenditures spent have been fitted to their intended use. With this premise, it is important for the Government to measure the performance of SOAs. The purpose of this study is to derive a simple and convenient equation using output-based approach to measure SOAs performance that may be used as a reference for the government in devising its policies. This research used the qualitative method with literature study and field testing through a study case. The research object is limited to SOAs in the form of office buildings. The results indicate that measuring SOAs performance using the proposed formula is applicable to SOAs in Indonesia, particularly those in the form of office buildings. Through such performance assessment, the potential of idle assets is expected to be minimized, and public asset planning process becomes more efficient by creating several alternative cost requirements over a certain period of planned asset output.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, V., & Felix, R. (2006). Computing Potential Output and The Output Gap. Economic Bulletin, p. 73.

Ball, I. (. (1999). Reforming Financial Management in the Public Sector”. Policy. Policy Study, Reason Public Policy Institute(No. 258 - part 3).

Brown, R., & Humphrey, B. (2005). Asset Management for Transmission and Distribution. Amerika: IEEE Power & energy Magazine.

Columbia, P. o. (2002). Capital asset management framework : Guidelines.

Ellis, R. (1998). Asset Utilization: A Metric for Focusing Reliability Efforts. Houston Texas: Seventh International Conference on Process Plant Reliability.

Gibson, V. (1994). Strategic Property Management: How Can Local Authorities Develop a Property Strategy? Property Management, Vol. 12 Iss 3 , pp. 9-14.

Grubisic, M., Nusinovic, M., & Gorana, R. (2008). From Accountable Government To Public Asset Management Reform and Welfare. Privredna Kretanja i Ekonomska Politika, 117.

Gumede, N., & Dipholo, K. B. (2014). Governance, Restructuring and the New Public Management Reform: South African Perspectives. Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 4 No.6, pp. 43 - 50.

Hadiyanto. (2009). Strategic Asset Management: Kontribusi Pengelolaan Aset Negara dalam Mewujudkan APBN yang Efektif dan Optimal.

Hauptmeier, S. (2009). Projecting Potential Output (1 ed.). Berlin: Physica-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Hitt, M., Middlemist, R. D., & Mathis, R. (1989). Management: Concepts and effective practice (3rd ed.). New York: West Publishing Company.

LBMN, P. I. (2016). Laporan BarangMilik Negara TA 2016.

LKPP, P. I. (2016). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat LKPP.

Ngwira, M., & Manase, D. (2016). Public Sector Property Asset Management. Willey Blackwel.

Tanzi, V., & Prakash, T. (2000). The Cost of Government and the Misuse of Public Assets. International Monetary Fund.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-06

How to Cite

Puspitarini, I., & Akhmadi, M. H. (2019). MEASURING PUBLIC ASSET PERFORMANCE USING OUTPUTBASED APPROACH: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i9.606