DESIGN PROBLEM-SOLVING: UNDERSTANDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ITERATIVE-BEHAVIOUR IN DESIGN

Authors

  • Danfulani Babangida Id Faculty of the Built Environment UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Khairul Anwar Mohamed Khaidzir Faculty of the Built Environment UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.228

Keywords:

Iterative-behaviour, modification, revisit, fixation, representation

Abstract

Different concepts and definitions associate iterative-behaviour with repetition. This study consider iterative-behaviour simply means as the act that involve repetition of activities to improve the evolving design. The research further investigate the significance of designer iterative behaviour in design using sketching as the media for design interaction. The retrospective protocol analysis
of the video data have identified and measure designer iterative behaviour in design, through a sketching and scoring sessions by five (5) final year undergraduate students and five (5) design tutors, all from the Department of Architecture, University of Technology Malaysia. The design and score were qualitatively and quantitatively compared using close group discussion and the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. The result shows that in design problemsolving, designer iterative-behaviours were not statistically significant in determining the quality of design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R., & Atman, C. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Aguero, C., Canas, J., Martin, F., & Perdices, E. (2010). Behavior-based iterative component architecture for soccer applications with the Nao humanoid. In 5th Workshop on Humanoids Soccer Robots. Nashville, TN, USA.

Akin, O., & Lin, C. (1995). Design protocol data and novel design decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236.

Bilda, Z., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27(5), 587-613.

Cross, N., & Anita, C. (1996). Winning by design: the methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Design Studies, 17(1), 91-107.

Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425- 437.

Eppinger, S., Nukala, M., & Whitney, D. (1997). Generalized models of design iteration using signal flow graphs. Research in Engineering Design, 9(11), 112-123.

Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1980). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo, 23(1), 117-126.

Furlinger, K., & Moore, S. (2008). Detection and analysis of iterative behavior in parallel applications. 8th ICCS, Krakow, Poland.

Gero, J., Tversky, B., & Purcell, T. (Eds.) (2001). Visual and spatial reasoning in design II. Sydney: Key Centre of Design. Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.

Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variance in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem-solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549-569.

Jin, Y., & Chusilp, P. (2006). Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design Studies, 27(1), 25-55.

Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects and designers. Toronto: John Wiley.

Robbins, E. (1994). Why architects draw. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.

Safoutin, M. (2003). A methodology for empirical measurement of iteration in engineering design processes (thesis). University of Washington.

Stauffer, L., & Ullman, D. (1991). Fundamental processes of mechanical designers based on empirical research. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2) 113-125.

Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385-403.

Tang, H., Lee, Y., & Gero, J. (2010). Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme. Design Studies, 32(1), 1-29.

Wynn, D., Claudia, E., & John, C. (2007). Modeling iteration in engineering design. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07, Paris, France.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-12

How to Cite

Babangida Id, D., & Mohamed Khaidzir, K. A. (2017). DESIGN PROBLEM-SOLVING: UNDERSTANDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ITERATIVE-BEHAVIOUR IN DESIGN. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.228