SYNTHESISING AN EFFECTIVE INCENTIVES SYSTEM IN SAFEGUARDING THE HERITAGE VILLAGE OF MELAKA AND GEORGE TOWN

Authors

  • Indera Syahrul Mat Radzuan Department of Real Estate Management Faculty of Technology Management & Business UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
  • Yahaya Ahmad Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.200

Keywords:

cultural heritage, incentives system, heritage village, case study.

Abstract

This paper summarizes the main findings derived from the field study held in three heritage villages located in the proximity of Melaka and George Town city. This study has employed a mixed method approach by using a questionnaire survey on the residents and interviews involving officials and local village leaders of the Morten Village and the Chitty Village in Melaka as well as the Clan Jetty Village in George Town. This study was conducted to address an overarching question, which is whether incentives programme that have been formulated for the community are suitable for their aspirations and needs. This paper analyses the residents’ perception on the effectiveness of the current incentives policy by using Bennett’s programme evaluation method. It evaluates the findings in relation to the present policy framework for understanding and managing the cultural heritage incentives programme in order to establish the sustainable community in the heritage village. As observed, this study has identified some constraints such as low quality of the conservation works and lack of incentives provision from the viewpoints of the local residents. In dealing with the efficiency of the current incentives programme, this study has taken the stance that a policy formulation for the incentives programme should visually reflect the ‘real’ needs of the local communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amran Hamzah & Rosli Noor. (2006). Is Melaka ready for World Heritage Listing.

Malaysian Town Plan, 3(1), 5-18.

Bennett, C. & Rockwell, K. (2004). Targeting outcomes of programs: a hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Faculty Publications:

Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department. University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Paper 48.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J.W., Clark, P., Clark, V.L.P., Gutmann, M.L. & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (209240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Goetz, K.S. (2010). Encouraging sustainable business, practices using incentives: A practitioner's view. Management Research Review, 33(11), 1043-1053. Hadlock, T.D. & Beckwith, J.A. (2002). Providing incentives for endangered species recovery. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7(3), 197-213.

Hockston, K. & Tan, H. (2011). Penang: An Inside Guide to its Historical Homes, Buildings, Monuments and Parks. Penang: Studio Howard.

Kamarul S. Kamal, Lilawati A. Wahab & A. Ghafar Ahmad. (2007). Conservation issues in the colonial built heritage of Malacca, Malaysia. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Science & Technology in Archaeology & Conservation. July 7-11, Granada-Baeza Spain.

Klein, R. (2000). The New Politics of the NHS (4th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

Kumar, C. (2007). Perceptions of incentives for participation: insights from joint forest management in India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(5), 532-542.

National Heritage Act 2005 (Act 645) (Malaysia).

Moorthy, R. (2009). The evolution of the Chitty community of Melaka. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies, 36, 1-15.

Read, D. (2005). Monetary incentives, what are they good for? Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2), 265-276.

Roddewig, R.J. (1987). Economic Incentives for Historic Preservation. Washington D.C.: National Trust for Historic Preservation, Centre for Preservation Policy Studies.

Rossman, G.B. & Wilson, B.L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.

Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

UNESCO (2011). Report on the Implementation of the Action Plan of Melaka, Malaysia. In Cultural Heritage Management and Tourism: Models for Co-operation among Stakeholders. Case Study: Melaka Historic City, Malaysia. Paper presented at the UNESCO-Norway Cultural Heritage and Tourism Project 2001, October 818, Lijiang, China.

Wee, B. (1999). Village where time stands still. New Straits Times: Heritage. pp 22.

Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-10

How to Cite

Mat Radzuan, I. S., & Ahmad, Y. (2016). SYNTHESISING AN EFFECTIVE INCENTIVES SYSTEM IN SAFEGUARDING THE HERITAGE VILLAGE OF MELAKA AND GEORGE TOWN. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.200