USER-CENTERED FURNITURE DESIGN FOR PET CO-LIVING SPACES

Authors

  • Wei Wenchao Faculty of Design and Architecture, UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
  • Athira Azmi Faculty of Design and Architecture, UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
  • Noranita Mansor Faculty of Design and Architecture, UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
  • Wan Mstura Shaik Mohamed Mossadeq Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.1996

Keywords:

Urban Mobility, Public Bus, User Perception, Service Quality, Ridership Rate

Abstract

The efficiency and effectiveness of public bus services are essential for fostering sustainable urban transportation. In Malaysia, despite widespread concerns about lengthy commutes, congestion-related stress, and high traffic fatality rates, private vehicles remain the dominant mode of transport, even among university students. This examines university students' perceptions of public bus service efficiency and effectiveness, aiming to identify areas for improvement to increase public transport usage. A mixed-method approach was adopted to provide a comprehensive analysis of users’ experiences and perceptions. Findings indicate that economic factors significantly influence ridership rates, particularly among young adults who often face financial constraints. At the same time, this demographic is highly mobile, relying on transportation for social, educational, and physical activities. Furthermore, satisfaction with service quality emerges as a critical determinant of public bus loyalty. To enhance efficiency and increase ridership, the study recommends addressing the multifaceted factors influencing public bus service use through a comprehensive strategy. Future research should delve into socioeconomic analyses to better understand these dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ai, J. (2022, January). Interactive cat furniture design. In 2021 International Conference on Culture, Design and Social Development (CDSD 2021) (pp. 43–48). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220109.009

Al-S’di, A. (2022, September). User centred design methods in animal centred design: A systematic review. In 2022 International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Computer Science and Engineering (ICTASCE) (pp. 84–89). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.885973

Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929

Curtis, T. M. (2020). Behavior problem or problem behavior. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 50(4), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.03.002

Dangkua, N. Y., Nandito, M. A., Jamil, F. H. P., & Rahayu, M. (2024). Implementing human-centric design in developing a multifunctional chair and storage solution for children. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 26(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.32734/jsti.v26i2.15362

De Paris, S. R., & Lopes, C. N. L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.004

Ellis, S. L. H. (2009). Environmental enrichment: Practical strategies for improving feline welfare. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 11(11), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2009.09.011

Ellis, S. L., Rodan, I., Carney, H. C., Heath, S., Rochlitz, I., Shearburn, L. D., … & Westropp, J. L. (2013). AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 15(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x13477537

Garip, E., Sağlar Onay, N., & Garip, S. B. (2021). A model for mass customization and flexibility in mass housing units. Open House International, 46(4), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0053

Henning, J. S. L., Fernandez, E. J., Nielsen, T., & Hazel, S. (2022). Play and welfare in domestic cats: Current knowledge and future directions. Animal Welfare, 31(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.31.4.005

Husein, H. A. (2021). Multifunctional furniture as a smart solution for small spaces for the case of Zaniary Towers apartments in Erbil City, Iraq. International Transactions Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.8

Jarža, L., Čavlović, A. O., Pervan, S., Španić, N., Klarić, M., & Prekrat, S. (2023). Additive technologies and their applications in furniture design and manufacturing. Drvna Industrija, 74(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2023.0012

Jirouš-Rajković, V., & Miklečić, J. (2021). Enhancing weathering resistance of wood—A review. Polymers, 13(12), 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121980

Liu, Y., Hu, W., Kasal, A., & Erdil, Y. Z. (2023). The state of the art of biomechanics applied in ergonomic furniture design. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212120

LYCS Architecture. (2014). Catable 1.0. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://www.lycs-arc.com/project/catable-1-0

LYCS Architecture. (2014). Catable 1.0. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://www.lycs-arc.com/project/catable-2-0

LYCS Architecture. (2014). LYCS Architecture awards the World Kindness for Animals Design Award for animal innovation. LYCS Architecture. https://en.lycs-arc.com/current/2014-innovator-for-animals-award

Malamed, R., & Sueda, K. L. C. (2022). Nuisance/destructive/unruly behaviors. In Clinical handbook of feline behavior medicine (pp. 190–211). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119653271.ch12

Müller, A., Steinke, J., Dorado, H., Keller, S., Jiménez, D., Ortiz-Crespo, B., & Schumann, C. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for human-centered design in CGIAR. Agricultural Systems, 219, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104005

Mutti, M. A. I., Khalid, N. A. M., & Yassin, H. R. M. (2024). Furniture design concept for the era of new norm. PaperASIA, 40(6b), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i6b.236

Ovenden, K., Bassett, I., & Sumner, C. L. (2024). ‘I want you to want me’: How owners value cats' choices has implications for cat containment. People and Nature, 6(2), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10580

Polat, A. I., & Gül, M. (2023). An analysis of mitigation measures for furniture in education buildings to prevent earthquake hazards. Journal of Interior Design and Academy, 3(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.53463/inda.20230186

Rossi, A. P., Dos Santos, C. R., Maia, C. M., Terzian, C. C., Predebon, D. F., de Queiroz, J. S., … & Corrêa, T. M. (2023). Rescued cats prefer to scratch fabrics commonly used to cover upholstered furniture. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 26(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1949595

Ruge, L., & Mancini, C. (2022). An ethics toolkit to support animal-centered research and design. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 891493. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTACSE50438.2022.10009842

Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2025). Emotional design in contemporary interior spaces: User experience and emerging trends. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1), 2025040. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025040

Singhal, T. S., Jain, J. K., Ramacharyulu, D. A., Jain, A., Abdul-Zahra, D. S., Manjunatha, M., & Srivastava, A. P. (2024). Eco-design of products and processes: A review on principles and tools for sustainable manufacturing. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 505, p. 01033). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450501033

Stone, E. (2019). What’s in it for the cats?: Cat shows as serious leisure from a multispecies perspective. Leisure Studies, 38(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1572776

Ulker, O. C., Ulker, O., & Hiziroglu, S. (2021). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from coated furniture units. Coatings, 11, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070806

Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., & Toppinen, A. (2020). A home made of wood: Consumer experiences of wooden building materials. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(6), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12586

Vojtkovská, V., Voslářová, E., & Večerek, V. (2020). Methods of assessment of the welfare of shelter cats: A review. Animals, 10(9), 1527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091527

Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-009

Yurttaş, N. B., & Altuncu, D. (2022). New possibilities of living together in post-humanist society: Interior and furniture design for pets. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 3(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i3058

Zhang, L., & McGlone, J. J. (2020). Scratcher preferences of adult in-home cats and effects of olfactory supplements on cat scratching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 227, 104997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104997

Zutshi, A., Creed, A., Holmes, M., & Brain, J. (2016). Reflections of environmental management implementation in furniture. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(8), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2015-0154

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Wenchao, W., Azmi, A., Mansor, N., & Mohamed Mossadeq, W. M. S. (2026). USER-CENTERED FURNITURE DESIGN FOR PET CO-LIVING SPACES. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(41). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.1996