USER-CENTERED FURNITURE DESIGN FOR PET CO-LIVING SPACES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.1996Keywords:
Furniture Design, Pet-Living Spaces, User-Centered Design (UCD)Abstract
As companion cats grow more integrated into modern households, there is a growing demand for furniture that meets the needs of both humans and their feline friends. Traditional pet products often clash with contemporary interior styles, while human-focused furniture typically lacks features that cater to cats’ well-being. This study applies user-centered design (UCD) principles to explore the creation of multifunctional furniture that enhances the coexistence of cats and their owners. Key design factors—including ergonomics, space efficiency, material selection, and user interaction—are examined to address challenges related to pet behaviors and owner preferences. Employing a qualitative approach, the study conducts a comparative analysis of two innovative pet-friendly furniture designs, evaluating functionality, material durability, and aesthetic integration. The findings indicate that integrating pet-oriented features into human furniture enhances human-animal interaction, improves feline welfare, and optimizes space use. However, challenges related to durability, maintenance, and affordability must be addressed to improve practicality and accessibility. This study contributes to the emerging field of pet-inclusive interior design by proposing a theoretical framework that integrates function, materials, and aesthetics in response to the growing demand for co-living and compact living solutions. Future research should explore customizable, technology-integrated, and sustainable designs that promote well-being for both humans and felines. By adopting a user-centered approach, designers can create adaptable furniture that fosters seamless interaction and maximizes comfort and functionality in shared living environments.
Downloads
References
Ai, J. (2022, January). Interactive cat furniture design. In 2021 International Conference on Culture, Design and Social Development (CDSD 2021) (pp. 43–48). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220109.009
Al-S’di, A. (2022, September). User centred design methods in animal centred design: A systematic review. In 2022 International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Computer Science and Engineering (ICTASCE) (pp. 84–89). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.885973
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929
Curtis, T. M. (2020). Behavior problem or problem behavior. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 50(4), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.03.002
Dangkua, N. Y., Nandito, M. A., Jamil, F. H. P., & Rahayu, M. (2024). Implementing human-centric design in developing a multifunctional chair and storage solution for children. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 26(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.32734/jsti.v26i2.15362
De Paris, S. R., & Lopes, C. N. L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.004
Ellis, S. L. H. (2009). Environmental enrichment: Practical strategies for improving feline welfare. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 11(11), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2009.09.011
Ellis, S. L., Rodan, I., Carney, H. C., Heath, S., Rochlitz, I., Shearburn, L. D., … & Westropp, J. L. (2013). AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 15(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x13477537
Garip, E., Sağlar Onay, N., & Garip, S. B. (2021). A model for mass customization and flexibility in mass housing units. Open House International, 46(4), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2021-0053
Henning, J. S. L., Fernandez, E. J., Nielsen, T., & Hazel, S. (2022). Play and welfare in domestic cats: Current knowledge and future directions. Animal Welfare, 31(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.31.4.005
Husein, H. A. (2021). Multifunctional furniture as a smart solution for small spaces for the case of Zaniary Towers apartments in Erbil City, Iraq. International Transactions Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.8
Jarža, L., Čavlović, A. O., Pervan, S., Španić, N., Klarić, M., & Prekrat, S. (2023). Additive technologies and their applications in furniture design and manufacturing. Drvna Industrija, 74(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2023.0012
Jirouš-Rajković, V., & Miklečić, J. (2021). Enhancing weathering resistance of wood—A review. Polymers, 13(12), 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121980
Liu, Y., Hu, W., Kasal, A., & Erdil, Y. Z. (2023). The state of the art of biomechanics applied in ergonomic furniture design. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212120
LYCS Architecture. (2014). Catable 1.0. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://www.lycs-arc.com/project/catable-1-0
LYCS Architecture. (2014). Catable 1.0. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://www.lycs-arc.com/project/catable-2-0
LYCS Architecture. (2014). LYCS Architecture awards the World Kindness for Animals Design Award for animal innovation. LYCS Architecture. https://en.lycs-arc.com/current/2014-innovator-for-animals-award
Malamed, R., & Sueda, K. L. C. (2022). Nuisance/destructive/unruly behaviors. In Clinical handbook of feline behavior medicine (pp. 190–211). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119653271.ch12
Müller, A., Steinke, J., Dorado, H., Keller, S., Jiménez, D., Ortiz-Crespo, B., & Schumann, C. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for human-centered design in CGIAR. Agricultural Systems, 219, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104005
Mutti, M. A. I., Khalid, N. A. M., & Yassin, H. R. M. (2024). Furniture design concept for the era of new norm. PaperASIA, 40(6b), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i6b.236
Ovenden, K., Bassett, I., & Sumner, C. L. (2024). ‘I want you to want me’: How owners value cats' choices has implications for cat containment. People and Nature, 6(2), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10580
Polat, A. I., & Gül, M. (2023). An analysis of mitigation measures for furniture in education buildings to prevent earthquake hazards. Journal of Interior Design and Academy, 3(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.53463/inda.20230186
Rossi, A. P., Dos Santos, C. R., Maia, C. M., Terzian, C. C., Predebon, D. F., de Queiroz, J. S., … & Corrêa, T. M. (2023). Rescued cats prefer to scratch fabrics commonly used to cover upholstered furniture. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 26(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1949595
Ruge, L., & Mancini, C. (2022). An ethics toolkit to support animal-centered research and design. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 891493. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTACSE50438.2022.10009842
Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2025). Emotional design in contemporary interior spaces: User experience and emerging trends. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1), 2025040. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025040
Singhal, T. S., Jain, J. K., Ramacharyulu, D. A., Jain, A., Abdul-Zahra, D. S., Manjunatha, M., & Srivastava, A. P. (2024). Eco-design of products and processes: A review on principles and tools for sustainable manufacturing. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 505, p. 01033). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450501033
Stone, E. (2019). What’s in it for the cats?: Cat shows as serious leisure from a multispecies perspective. Leisure Studies, 38(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1572776
Ulker, O. C., Ulker, O., & Hiziroglu, S. (2021). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from coated furniture units. Coatings, 11, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070806
Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., & Toppinen, A. (2020). A home made of wood: Consumer experiences of wooden building materials. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(6), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12586
Vojtkovská, V., Voslářová, E., & Večerek, V. (2020). Methods of assessment of the welfare of shelter cats: A review. Animals, 10(9), 1527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091527
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-009
Yurttaş, N. B., & Altuncu, D. (2022). New possibilities of living together in post-humanist society: Interior and furniture design for pets. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 3(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i3058
Zhang, L., & McGlone, J. J. (2020). Scratcher preferences of adult in-home cats and effects of olfactory supplements on cat scratching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 227, 104997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104997
Zutshi, A., Creed, A., Holmes, M., & Brain, J. (2016). Reflections of environmental management implementation in furniture. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(8), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2015-0154
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
