CAMPUS WALKABILITY IN MALAYSIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: A CASE-STUDY OF UNIVERSITI MALAYA

Authors

  • Liow Ken Keat Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Naziaty Mohd Yaacob Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Nor Rasidah Hashim Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.196

Keywords:

Walkability, pedestrian-friendly, campus planning

Abstract

Universities are important innovation hubs for sustainable development. As universities worldwide are striving to provide conducive living and learning environments for their students and staff, the mobility of campus users is one of the challenges that have to be overcome immediately. In order to understand the issues of campus mobility, this study was conducted to evaluate a component of mobility, i.e. its walkability features and potential. The location of this study was in Universiti Malaya. We divided the study in two stages: 1. Students’ surveys to find out their perceptions on the features, potential and policy on walkability. 2. Direct observations and measurements of the existing walkability conditions (vehicular and pedestrian circulation and the street elements that constitute a walkable environment). The main findings were as follows: Most students perceived the overall walkability environment at UM did not give them a positive walking experience on campus. Street elements that are user-friendly were found to be lacking although there existed some positive ones, e.g. traffic calming devices especially at pedestrian crossing area. Although this is a case study of UM, we feel that the issues are of general interest to other university campuses, especially those located in major cities and having the same organizational structure. We would therefore recommend university management to conduct periodical campus walkability evaluation and to take the user’s perceptions seriously so as to provide better adaptation solutions to their campus sustainability projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelidis. C., Candlish, J., Haynes, J., Holder, A., Smith, O. & Ashley, H. (2014), Studley Campus Walkability Assessment. Odalhousie University.

Boodlal, L. (2003), Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings — an informational guide. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

Banning J. H. (1993). The pedestrian's visual experience on campus: informal learning of cultural messages. The Campus Ecologist, 11(1), 1-4.

Emery, J. & Crump, C. (2003). The WABSA Project: Assessing and Improving Your Community’s Walkability and Bikeability. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Handy, S. (2005). Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Transportation Research Board and the Institute of Medicine Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use. Resource Paper for TRB 79 Special Report 282.

Lewis, R. K. (2004). Bricks, mortar, and vision: a guide for campus planning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(29), B20-B22.

Littlefield, D. (2012). Metric Handbook Planning and Design Data. London: Routledge.

Makki, S., Surat, M., Che-Ani, A-I., Farkisch, H. & Mokhtarian, H.R. (2012). The importance of design characteristics in walking from student’s perspective: a case study in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Building Performance, 3(1), 42-49.

Malaysian Standards (2014). MS 1184:2014; Universal Design and Accessibility in the Built Environment-Code of Practice for the Public.

Mohd Zulhanif, A.R., Nur Akmal,G.A., Muhammad Farihan Irfan, M.N., Ismar M.S.U. & Adi Irfan, C-A. (2011). Toward a sustainable campus: comparison of the physical development planning of research university campuses in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4), 210-221.

Park, S. (2008). Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users' Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station. PhD Dissertation, University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley.

Registration Admissions and Records of Universiti Malaya (2014). unpublished.

Rugayah, H., Shireen, H., Sabariah, M. & Farihah, H. (2013). Assessment of campus bus service efficacy: an application towards green environment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 294 - 303.

Strange, C. C. & Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by Design: Creating Campus Learning Environment That Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-10

How to Cite

Keat, L. K., Mohd Yaacob, N., & Hashim, N. R. (2016). CAMPUS WALKABILITY IN MALAYSIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: A CASE-STUDY OF UNIVERSITI MALAYA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.196