INCORPORATING WALKING IN TRAVEL TO WORK: THE MEANING OF COMMUTING FOR KUALA LUMPUR COMMUNITY

Authors

  • Mastura Adam Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Ahmed Abu Bakar Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.195

Keywords:

Travel to work, walking experience, pedestrian environment, resilience, transformation, sustainable transportation

Abstract

Progressive increase in the influx of privately owned vehicles and a decrease in the modal share of public transport over the years become a city-based phenomenon. Over-dependence on cars encouraged a sedentary lifestyle, an obesity epidemic, social exclusion and increased carbon footprint. Deficiencies in urban planning have created a spatial separation between employment centres and residential areas. The research focused on investigating how people construct the meaning attributed to commuting mode of travel to work. Using multiple embedded case study research approach, this research focuses on 19 semistructured interviews with employees from two neighbouring but contrasting case study areas of Kuala Lumpur. Synthesis of the employees’ experiences on their travel behaviour exposed replication logic on the way they perceived walking as part of the transportation mode of travelling to work. The implicit understanding of the walking to work includes; definition of walking to work by the communities, specific walking stages and its’ characteristic during am-pm rush hours, the travel pattern and modes of transportation from the origin point (home) to the office, and the understanding of walking benefits to their economy, environment, health and social. These results provide possibility of understanding the needs of people and to promote walking to work as part of transportation mode for commuting in order to overcome the current urban challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, M. (2013). An Exploration of the Employee's Perception of Walking: Enhancing the Walking Experience in Kuala Lumpur. (Ph.D.), University of Salford, UK, An unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.

Bauman, A., Smith, B., Stoker, L., Bellew, B. & Booth, M. (1999). Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: evidence of a “coastal effectâ€. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23(3), 322-324.

British Heart Foundation. (2001). Physical Activity and Your Heart: Health Information Series 1. [Retrieved 2014 Dec 23]. Available from: /http://www.bhf.org.uk/ publications/uploaded/bhf_his01_physical_activity.pdf,S.

Chief Medical Officer (2004). At least five a week: evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. London: Department of Health.

Department of Health (2004). Choosing health: making healthy choices easier. London: Stationery Office.

Giles-Corti, B., Foster, S., Shilton, T. & Falconer, R. (2010). The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 21(6), 122-127.

Grava, S. (2003). Urban Transportation Systems: Choice for communities. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Kopelman P. G. (2000). Obesity as a medical problem. Nature, 404(6778), 635-643.

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage.

Lee, C. & Moudon, A. V. (2006). Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3, S77.

Litman, T. (2011). How Land Use Factors affect Travel Behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org viewed 12/05/11.

Litman, T. A. (2009). Economic value of walkability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 3-11.

Morris, J. & Hardman, A. (1997). Walking to health. Sports Med, 23, 306-332.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.

Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social Research. South Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sexton, M. (2003). A supple approach to exposing and challenging assumptions and path dependencies in research. Paper presented at the 3rd International Postgraduate Research Conference, April, Lisbon, Portugal.

Southworth, M. (2007). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246-257.

Tolley, R. (2003). Providing for Pedestrians: Principles and Guidelines Access To Destinations and Urban Spaces. Department of Infrastructure, Victoria, Australia.

Transport for London & Central London Partnership (2004). Towards a fine city for people.Retrieved from https://issuu.com/gehlarchitects/docs/

issuu_270_london_pspl_2004.

Wikstrom, A. (2013). The Challenge of Change: Planning for Social Urban Resilience: An Analysis of Contemporary Planning Aims and Practices. Master’s Thesis, Stockholm Uiversity.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design & methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-10

How to Cite

Adam, M., & Abu Bakar, A. (2016). INCORPORATING WALKING IN TRAVEL TO WORK: THE MEANING OF COMMUTING FOR KUALA LUMPUR COMMUNITY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i5.195