GIS ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD ENVIRONMENT DETERMINANTS THAT INFLUENCE WALKABILITY IN PENANG, MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i35.1675Keywords:
GIS, Walkability, Neighbourhood Planning, Sustainable Urban Environments, Community FacilitiesAbstract
Understanding the relationship between urban design and physical activities is crucial. Studies have identified three key neighbourhood environment indices that enhance walkability. This research investigates the influences of these indices on residents’ walkability to community facilities in two neighbourhoods in Penang Island, Malaysia. Using geographic information system (GIS) technology, we analyse the effect of the built environment on walkability through buffering and thematic map analyses. Pulau Tikus features medium- and low-density housing with enriched community facilities, whilst Tanjung Tokong has a higher residential density, more road intersections and more diverse housing options. Findings indicate that Pulau Tikus offers better amenity accessibility, whilst Tanjung Tokong’s high-rise residential buildings and diverse housing types enhance walkability. This study highlights the relationship amongst residential density, road intersections, mixed land use and walkability in two residential neighbourhoods. Higher residential density and more road intersections increase walking activity, whilst mixed land use further influences resident mobility patterns. These insights can aid urban planners in designing more walkable, liveable and sustainable neighbourhoods.
Downloads
References
Adams, M. A., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Chapman, J., L.B., C., Coffee, N., Salvo, D., L., du T., Dygrýn, J., A.A., H., Lai, P., Mavoa, S., Pinzon, J. D., Van de Weghe, N., Cerin, E., Davey, R., Macfarlane, D., Owen, N., & Sallis, J. F. (2014). International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN adult study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13, 43. http://0-ovidsp.ovid.com.lib.exeter.ac.uk/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed12&NEWS=N&AN=25343966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-43
Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021a). Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218
Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021b). Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7(September), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218
Barton, H., Grant, M., & Guise, R. (2003). Shaping neighbourhoods: a guide for health, sustainability and vitality. (No Title).
Basu, N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M., & Haque, M. M. (2023). What do pedestrians consider when choosing a route? The role of safety, security, and attractiveness perceptions and the built environment during day and night walking. Cities, 143(August 2022), 104551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104551
Choi, D. ah, & Ewing, R. (2021). Effect of street network design on traffic congestion and traffic safety. Journal of Transport Geography, 96(September), 103200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103200
Federal Highway Administration. (2022). IMPROVING INTERSECTIONS FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS Informational Guide. April.
Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A., & Schmid, T. L. (2004). Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011
Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2 SUPPL. 2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
Frank, L., Sallis, J., Conway, T., Chapman, J., Saelens, B., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many Pathways from Land Use to Health and Air Quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(No. I), 75–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976725
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2003). Relative Influences of Individual, Social Environmental, and Physical Environmental Correlates of Walking. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1583–1589. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1583
Glazier, R. H., Creatore, M. I., Weyman, J. T., Fazli, G., Matheson, F. I., Gozdyra, P., Moineddin, R., Shriqui, V. K., & Booth, G. L. (2014). Density, destinations or both? A comparison of measures of walkability in relation to transportation behaviors, obesity and diabetes in Toronto, Canada. PLoS ONE, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085295
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2 SUPPL. 1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
Ipsos Press, R. (2023). STATE OF THE MALAYSIAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM : MENTAL HEALTH IS RECOGNIZED AS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT HEALTH ISSUE GLOBALLY AND IN MALAYSIA . MALAYSIANS ALSO FACE CHALLENGES RELATED TO COVID-19 ,. October.
Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F., & Ramos, R. (2021). Accessibility and connectivity criteria for assessing walkability: An application in qazvin, iran. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073648
Jafari, A., Singh, D., & Giles-Corti, B. (2023). Residential density and 20-minute neighbourhoods: A multi-neighbourhood destination location optimisation approach. Health and Place, 83(December 2022), 103070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103070
Karwand, Z., Mokhtar, S., Hustim, M., & Shimizu, T. (2024). EVALUATING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ATTRIBUTES AT INTERSECTIONS IN KABUL CITY, AFGHANISTAN: A COMPUTER VISION APPROACH. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i33.1545
Khisty, C. J. (1994). Evaluation_of_Pedestreian_facilities_Bay. In Transportation Research Record (Vol. 1438, pp. 46–49).
Koohsari, M. J., Sugiyama, T., Lamb, K. E., Villanueva, K., & Owen, N. (2014). Street connectivity and walking for transport: Role of neighborhood destinations. Preventive Medicine, 66, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.019
Leh, O. L. H., Marhalim, F. A., Musthafa, S. N. A. M., Abdullah, Y. A., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2015). The relationship of human happiness and neighbourhood planning: Case study Puchong Indah Housing Estate, Selangor, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 13, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v13.i5.139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v13i5.139
Leslie, E., Butterworth, I., & Edwards, M. (2006). Measuring the walkability of local communities using Geographic Information Systems data.
Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health and Place, 13(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
Leslie, E., Saelens, B., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Coffee, N., & Hugo, G. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: A pilot study. Health and Place, 11(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005
Nagata, S., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Amagasa, S., Kikuchi, H., & Inoue, S. (2020). Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: Statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images. Health and Place, 66, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428
Paydar, M., Fard, A. K., & Khaghani, M. M. (2020). Walking toward metro stations; the contribution of distance, attitudes, and perceived built environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410291
Pentella, R. (2009a). Walkability and the Built Environment: A Neighborhood- and Street-Scale Assessment of Diverse San Francisco Neighborhoods Ricky Pentella: Walkability Assessment of San Francisco, May 11 2009. 1–22.
Pentella, R. (2009b). Walkability and the built environment: A neighborhood-and street-scale assessment of diverse San Francisco neighborhoods. Walkability Assessment of San Francisco May 11th.
Rodríguez, D. A., & Joo, J. (2004). The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2003.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2003.11.001
Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins (CEEV) (2016b) Internal market and food safety. Comité Vins, Brussels. http://ceev.eu/policy-dossiers/internal-market-food-safety. Accessed 02 Nov 2016. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1552–1558. http://ceev.eu/policy-dossiers/internal-market-food-safety
Saelens, B., & Sallis, J. (2002). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey (NEWS) & Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey–Abbreviated (NEWS-A). Active Living Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t49853-000
Shigematsu, R., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Cain, K. L., Chapman, J. E., & King, A. C. (2009). Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318185496c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318185496c
Survey, N. H. (2019). Key findings (Vol. 20). https://doi.org/10.18356/be4d1601-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/be4d1601-en
Vichiensan, V., & Nakamura, K. (2021). Walkability perception in asian cities: A comparative study in bangkok and nagoya. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126825
Wagai, J. (2016). The Street Connectivity Index ( SCI ) of six municipalities in Jalisco State, Mexico. 1–66.
Weliange, S. D. S., Fernando, D., Withanage, S., & Gunatilake, J. (2021). A GIS based approach to neighbourhood physical environment and walking among adults in Colombo municipal council area, Sri Lanka. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10983-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10983-7
World Health Organization. (2022). Global status report on physical activity 2022. In WHO Press, World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/physical-activity/global-status-report-on-physical-activity-2022
Yang, Y. (2023). Land use density, land use mix, and walking: insight from a simple theoretical model. MedRxiv, 2011–2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.29.23299138
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
