THE IMPACT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN ON COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY SETTINGS AND URBAN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

  • Siti Rasidah MD Sakip Department of Built Environment & Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SERI ISKANDAR CAMPUS
  • Nur Afizah Mohd Khair Department of Built Environment & Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SERI ISKANDAR CAMPUS
  • Azizah MD Ajis Department of Built Environment & Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SERI ISKANDAR CAMPUS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1648

Keywords:

Biophilic design, Student well-being, Learning ability, Urban design, VR simulations

Abstract

This study explores the potential of biophilic design to enhance student learning within university libraries, an often-neglected aspect of urban design. While offices and hospitals have been extensively studied for their impact on well-being and performance, post-secondary education settings have received limited attention. A mixed-methods approach was conducted in this study, including interviews, VR simulation experiments, and a questionnaire survey. The results revealed a significant reduction in participants' blood pressure and heart rate following the implementation of the biophilic design. There were also unanimous reports of improved learning experiences; statistical analysis confirmed these positive effects, highlighting the calming influence of biophilic indoor environments on students. The study emphasised the benefits of creating conducive learning spaces and fostering pro-environmental behaviours. This research underscores the importance of integrating sustainable and biophilic design principles into urban educational environments, ultimately enhancing student well-being and academic performance in a student-centric urban design theme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelaal, M. S., & Soebarto, V. (2018). History Matters: The Origins of BiophilicDesign Of Innovative Learning Spaces in Traditional Architecture History Matters: The Origins Of Biophilic Design Of Innovative Learning Spaces In Traditional. November. Https://Doi.Org/10.26687/Archnet-Ijar.V12i3.1655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1655

Atchley, R. A., Strayer, D. L., & Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity In the Wild: Improving Creative Reasoning Through Immersion in Natural Settings. Plos ONE, 7(12), 11–13. Https://Doi.Org/10.1371/Journal.Pone.0051474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051474

Ayuso Sanchez, J., Ikaga, T., & Vega Sanchez, S. (2018). Quantitative improvement in workplace performance through biophilic design: A pilot experiment case study. Energy and Buildings, 177, 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.065

Benfield, J. A., Rainbolt, G. N., Bell, P. A., & Donovan, G. H. (2015). Classrooms WithNature Views: Evidence Of Differing Student Perceptions and Behaviors.Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0013916513499583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513499583

Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., Kaplan, S., Sherdell, L., Gotlib, I. H., & Jonides, J. (2012). Interacting With Nature Improves Cognition And Affect For Individuals With Depression.Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jad.2012.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012

Browning, R. &. (2018). 14 Patterns Of Biophilic Design. Byrne, J., & Humble, Á. M. (2007). An Introduction to Mixed Method Research. Atlantic Research Centre for Family-Work Issues, December, 1–4. Http://Www.Msvu.Ca/Site/Media/Msvu/Mixedmethodologyhandout.Pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91113-7_1

Dewi, O. C., Ismoyo, A. D., Felly, R., Aisyah, & Yohardi, L. (2020). Energy-Efficient Lighting and Biophilic Design Concept to Boost Reading Interest in Social Facilities‟ Library. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 505(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.1088/1755-1315/505/1/012008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/505/1/012008

Gerber, B. L., & Education, S. (2001). Relationships Among Informal Learning Environments, Teaching Procedures and Scientific. 23, 535–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116971

Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A Review of Psychological Literature on The Health and Wellbeing Benefits of Biophilic Design. Buildings, 5(3), 948–963.

Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Buildings5030948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948

Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3

Joshi, A., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored And Explained Likert Scale: Explored And explained. Https://Doi.Org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 Kaplan, S. (1996). The Restorative Benefits Of Nature: Toward An Integrative Framework. 1995, 169–182.

Kellert, S. R. (2008). Dimensions, Elements, And Attributes Of Biophilic Design. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science And Practice Of Bringing Buildings To Life.Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Profile/Stephen_Kellert/Publication/284608721_Dimensions_Elements_And_Attributes_Of_Biophilic_Design/Links/56619da108ae4931cd59f2ed.Pdf

Kim, J. A. (2017). User Perception and Use of The Academic Library: A Correlation

Analysis. Journal Of Academic Librarianship, 43(3), 209–215. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Acalib.2017.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.03.002

Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact Of Views To School Landscapes On Recovery From Stress And Mental Fatigue. Landscape And Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Landurbplan.2015.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015

Marzukhi, M. A., Ghazali, N. M., Leh, O. L. H., Khalid, N. S., Kamaruddin, S. M., & Azizul, M. F. (2020). The influence of urban planning on mental health. Case study: Federal territory of Kuala Lumpur. Planning Malaysia, 18(4), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.825

Nursalam, 2016, Metode Penelitian, & Fallis, A. (2013). Biophilic Principles for EnergyEfficient Library Building Design: The Need for Retrofitting Existing Library Building Stocks In Nigerian. Journal Of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Othman, R., Shahrill, M., Mundia, L., Tan, A., & Huda, M. (2016). Investigating TheRelationship Between the Student‟s Ability and Learning Preferences: Evidence From Year 7 Mathematics Students. New Educational Review, 44(2),125–138. Https://Doi.Org/10.15804/Tner.2016.44.2.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.10

Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064

Roetzel, A., DeKay, M., Nakai Kidd, A., Klas, A., Sadick, A. M., Whittem, V., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2020). Architectural, indoor environmental, personal and cultural influences on students’ selection of a preferred place to study. Architectural Science Review, 63(3–4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1691971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1691971

Ryan, C. O., & Browning, W. D. (2018). Biophilic Design. In Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1034-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1034-1

Saleh, S. F., Latip, N. S. A., & Rahim, A. A. (2018). Assessment of learning with nature in preschool. Planning Malaysia, 16(3), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.499

Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2004). Effects Of an Indoor Plant on Creative Task

Performance And Mood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 373–381.

Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1467-9450.2004.00419.X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00419.x

Sufar, S., Talib, A., & Hambali, H. (2012). Towards A Better Design: Physical Interior Environments Of Public Libraries In Peninsular Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Sbspro.2012.04.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.174

Shi, X., Abel, T., & Wang, L. (2020). Influence Of Two Motion Types on Solar Transmittance and Daylight Performance of Dynamic Façades. Solar Energy, 201(1), 561–580. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Solener.2020.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.017

Walimbe, S., & Chitgopkar, S. (2018). Nurturing Children‟s Biophilia Through Nature Connectedness in School Buildings for A Sustainable Future. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 187–192.

Wijesooriya, N., & Brambilla, A. (2020). Bridging Biophilic Design and EnviromentallySustainable Design: A Critical Review. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 124591. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jclepro.2020.124591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124591

Yin, J., Arfaei, N., Macnaughton, P., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Effects Of Biophilic Interventions in Office on Stress Reaction and Cognitive Function: A Randomized Crossover Study in Virtual Reality. Indoor Air, 29(6), 1028–1039. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Ina.12593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12593

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

MD Sakip, S. R., Mohd Khair, N. A., & MD Ajis, A. (2024). THE IMPACT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN ON COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY SETTINGS AND URBAN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(34). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1648