THE NEXUS OF LANDSCAPE: INTERRELATION BETWEEN LANDSCAPE VALUE WITH ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1615Keywords:
landscape value, landscape governance, associated landscape regulationAbstract
The landscape spectrum of Malaysia portrays rich, multiple natural and developed landscapes. Surprisingly, there are not any regulations that directly govern the landscape. It depends entirely on existing regulations that are not mentioned in detail regarding the 'landscape' specifically. As an alternative mechanism, it has several regulations used by landscape practitioners that help to manage and govern landscape planning and development. It regrets that these regulations have not been properly enforced due to some issues, which potentially can cause inefficiencies in development. Landscape value is an effective way to deeply understand the significance of landscape holistically. This study aims to examine related acts concerning landscape value in Malaysia using an archival review, identify the interrelationship of the landscape with associated regulations and analyze the relationship between these acts and the understanding of landscape in Malaysia. The findings of this research will be used to discover potentialities and constraints of the associated landscape regulations regarding their relationship with landscape value and landscape governance in Malaysia.
Downloads
References
A Landscape Architecture Guide to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals 3 Editorial Board and Executive Committee 2020-2022. (2021). https://www.iflaworld.com/
Allain. S, Plumecocq. G, Leenhardt. D, (2017). How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices. Ecological Economics, Volume 136, Pages 282–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.011
Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
Beunen, R., & Opdam, P. (2011). When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.018
Biedenweg, K., Williams, K., Cerveny, L., & Styers, D. (2019). Is recreation a landscape value? Exploring underlying values in landscape values mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 185, 24-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.12.005
Brown, G. (2005) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications, Society & Natural Resources, 18(1), pp. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590881853
Brown, G., & Brabyn, L. (2012). An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape and urban planning, 107(3), 317-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007
Brown, G. & Reed, P. (2000) Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning, Forest Science, 46(2), pp. 240–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240
Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography, 34, 316–324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007
European Landscape Convention. (2000). The European Landscape Convention, European Treaty, Series No. 176.
Gamboa, G., Otero, I., Bueno, C., Arilla, E., Ballart, H., Camprubí, L., Canaleta, G., Tolosa, G., & Castellnou, M. (2023). Participatory multi-criteria evaluation of landscape values to inform wildfire management. Journal of Environmental Management, 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116762
Gareth Doherty and Charles Waldheim (2016). Is Landscape …? Essays on the Identity of Landscape, Routledge, New York, USA.
García-Martín, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2018). Dimensions of landscape stewardship across Europe: landscape values, place attachment, awareness, and personal responsibility. Sustainability, 10(1), 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010263
Ibrahim, R., Rahman, N. A., & Tahir, O. M. (2009). Developing a soft-scape standard for improving the landscape quality in Malaysia. Alam Cipta, 4, 29-36.
Jackman, A., (1980). The place of landscape assessment: a definitive statement. The Landscape 9: 2-7.
Jones, M. (2007). The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32(5), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701552753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701552753
Landscape Institute (2021). Assessing landscape value outside national designations. Technical Guidance Note
Muhamad, R., Abdullah, Z., Latip, A. R. A., Saat, S. A., & Bakar, N. A. (2023). Community Satisfaction Towards Political Representatives: Explaining The Role Of Good Governance Practices. Planning Malaysia, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1413
Pereponova, A., Lischeid, G., Grahmann, K., Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D., & Ewert, F. A. (2023). Use of the term “landscape” in sustainable agriculture research: A literature review. In Heliyon (Vol. 9, Issue 11). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22173
Suaree, N. A. S. M., Kader, S. Z. S. A., Osman, M. M., Manaf, Z. I. A., & Jaffree, W. K. A. W. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Frameworks for SIA and EIA in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1388
Suryantini, R., Atmodiwirjo, P., Yatmol, Y. A., & Harahap, M. M. Y. (2021). Landscape Transformation: Exploring Operations in the Traditional Practice of Brickmaking. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 794(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012190
Teh, M. Z., Maulan, S., Noor, M. S. M., Bakar, S. A., & Abdullah, M. (2024). Landscape Governance: A Review of Associated Landscape Regulations In Malaysia. Journal of Islamic, 9(61), 228-239.
Teh, M. Z., Pugi, N. A., & Rahman, N. A. (2017). Visual Landscape Assessment for Development Landscape Structure: Case study at Taiping, Perak. E-BPJ, 2 (5), March. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i5.698
Teh, M. Z., Ghani, I., Abdullah, M., & Pugi, N. A. (2020). Landscape character: Relationship between existing acts, policies and guidelines in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(14), 165-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5i14.2259
Teh, M. Z., Abdullah, M., Pugi, N. A., & Rahman, N. A. (2018). Visual Landscape Assessment: A method for analysing and planning for landscape structure. Asian J. Qual. Life, 3, 33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v3i14.181
Wirawan, A., Raharjo, T., Ubed, R. S., & Yudanto, A. A. (2023). Legal Construct Of Village-Owned Springs Management As A Village Government Asset. Planning Malaysia, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1304
Zhu, X., Pfueller, S., Whitelaw, P., & Winter, C. (2010). Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management, 45(5), 896–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9462-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
