COMPARISON OF BIM-BASED QUANTITIES TAKE-OFF IN QUANTITY SURVEYING PROFESSION

Authors

  • Lam Tatt Soon School of Architecture, Building and Design, TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY
  • Lik Syuen Wong School of Architecture, Building and Design, TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY
  • Myzatul Aishah Kamarazaly School of Architecture, Building and Design, TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY
  • Chai Chang Saar School of Architecture, Building and Design, TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY
  • Habizah Sheikh Ilmi School of Architecture, Building and Design, TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1499

Keywords:

Quantity Surveying profession, Building Information Modelling (BIM), Quantity take-off (QTO), Autodesk Revit, Cubicost TAS

Abstract

Quantity surveyor (QS) plays an important role in a construction project who is responsible for the construction cost. Quantity take-off (QTO) will be conducted by QS to measure the quantities of materials needed for the construction project followed by the preparation of bills of quantities (BQ). Building information modelling (BIM) was introduced to the construction industry and brings many benefits to the QTO process such as time saving and high accuracy. However, BIM-based QTO consists of numerous issues such as 3D modelling issues, quantities extraction issues and data loss issues. Hence, this research aims to compare and analyse the application of BIM-based QTO in the QS profession. The objectives of this research cover the comparison of BIM-based QTO in BIM software as well as the analysis of quantities extraction which complies with Malaysian Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works Second Edition (SMM2). This research was conducted by using two types of BIM software which are Autodesk Revit and Cubicost TAS. This research is expected to benefit the QS profession by delivering a better understanding of using BIM for QTO with the analysis and comparison of QTO data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, A. R. N., Mohammad, M. F., Maisyam, M., & Hong, E. W. W. (2015). Desirable Characteristics of Malaysian Standard Metho d of Measurements (MySMMs) in Meeting Industry Quality Standards. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.210

Ali, M., Ismail, K. M., Hashim, K. S. H. Y., Suhaimi, S., & Mustafa, M. H. (2018). Heritage Building Preservation Through Building Information Modelling: Reviving Cultural Values Through Level of Development Exploration. Planning Malaysia Journal, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.461

Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and management in engineering, 11(3), 241-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.

Canadian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (2021). What is quantity surveying? Retrieved from https://ciqs.org/web/About-us/Quantity-Surveying/web/01- About-Us-Pages/What-isquantity-surveying.aspx?hkey=63233e4c-9d6a-4a27-80e9-8c4b0390

Czmoch, I., & Pękala, A. (2014). Traditional design versus BIM based design. Procedia Engineering, 91, 210-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.048

Godinho, M., Machete, R., Ponte, M., Falcão, A. P., Gonçalves, A. B., & Bento, R. (2020). BIM as a resource in heritage management: An application for the National Palace of Sintra, Portugal. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 43, 153-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.010

Hashim, N., Yap, F. M., Kamarazaly, M. A., Chin, S. A. L., Azrina, Md.& Loo, S. K. (2021). Building Information Modeling–Utilization in QS consultant firms and competency requirements of QS graduates. Malaysian Construction Research Journal (MCRJ)

Hussin, A. A., & Omran, A. (2009). Roles of professionals in construction industry. The International Conference on Economics and Administration, Faculty of Administration and Business, University of Bucharest, Romania ICEA-FAA Bucharest. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11943997.pdf

Juneja, P. (2022). Desk Research – Methodology and Technique. Management Study Guide. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyguide.com/desk- research.htm

Khosakitchalert, C., Yabuki, N., & Fukuda, T. (2019). Improving the accuracy of BIM-based quantity takeoff for compound elements. Automation in Construction, 106, 102891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102891

Latiffi, A. A., Mohd, S., Kasim, N., & Fathi, M. S. (2013). Building information modeling (BIM) application in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2(4A), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.res.2014.79

Liu, H., Lu, M., & Al-Hussein, M. (2016). Ontology-based semantic approach for construction-oriented quantity take-off from BIM models in the light-frame building industry. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(2), 190-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.03.001

Loh, Y. W. (2018). Limitations and acceptability feature of glodon. Universiti Tekonologi Malaysia. Retrieved from https://bic.utm.my/files/2018/08/LOH- YEONG-WEI-THESIS.pdf

Mesároš, P., Smetanková, J., & Mandičák, T. (2019). The fifth dimension of BIM–implementation survey. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 222, No. 1, p. 012003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012003

Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., Memon, I., & Azman, N. I. A. (2014). BIM in Malaysian construction industry: status, advantages, barriers and strategies to enhance the implementation level. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 606-614. doi:10.19026/rjaset.8.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.8.1012

Monteiro, A., & Martins, J. P. (2012). BIM modeling for contractors-improving model takeoffs. CIB W078 29th International Conference on Applications of it in the AEC Industry.

Monteiro, A., & Martins, J. P. (2013). A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-oriented BIM-based design. Automation in Construction, 35, 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.005

Ngo, T. V. N. (2018). Implementation of Building Information Model (BIM) in terms of quantity takeoff (QTO) and estimation at construction consultant company in Vietnam. Retrieved from https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/153497/Master%20thesis%20-%20Ngo.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Olsen, D., & Taylor, J. M. (2017). Quantity take-off using building information modeling (BIM), and its limiting factors. Procedia engineering, 196, 1098-1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.067

Omar, F., & Fateh, M. A. M. (2023). Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) In Building Information Modelling (Bim) Application In Government Healthcare Facilities Projects In Malaysia. Planning Malaysia Journal, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1257

Pratoom, W., & Tangwiboonpanich, S. (2016). A comparison of rebar Quantities Obtained By Traditional vs BIM-Based Methods. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 23(1), 5-10.

ProEst (2021). What is Quantity Takeoff in Construction? Retrieved from https://proest.com/construction/takeoffs/quantity-takeoff/

Reyes, N. (2020). Top 5 Benefits of BIM Construction. HMC Architects. Retrieved from https://hmcarchitects.com/news/top-5-benefits-of-bim-construction-2020-05-13/

Simeone, D., Schaumann, D., Kalay, Y. E., & Carrara, G. (2013). Adding users’ dimension to BIM. In EAEA-11 conference (Track 3) Conceptual Representation: exploring the layout of the built environment (pp. 483-490). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/43116406/Adding_users_dimension_to_BIM20160226-11685-1ko8owh.pdf

Soon, L. T., Hassan, H., & Abidin, N. Z. (2019). Comparison between the constraints of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and 3D modelling. In AWAM International Conference on Civil Engineering (pp. 695-718). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_49

Tanko, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, C. Y. (2019). Limitations of using the Revit-BIM software for quantification. 23rd PAQS Congress 2019.

Vassen, S. A. (2021). Impact of BIM-based quantity take off for accuracy of cost estimation. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10(3), 55-69. doi: 10.5923/j.ijcem.20211003.01

Vieira, L., Campos, M., Granja, J. & Azenha, M. (2022) Framework for (semi) automatised construction specification and quantity takeoff in the context of small and medium architectural design offices. Archit. Struct. Constr. 2, 403–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00071-8

Villegas, F. (2023). Desk Research: What it is, Tips & Examples. QuestionPro. Retrieved from https://VVV.questionpro.com/blog/desk-research/#: :text=Desk%20research%20is0/o20a%20type,be%20used%20for%20research%20purposes.

Xu, Z., Lu, X., Zeng, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Seismic loss assessment for buildings with various-LOD BIM data. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 39, 112-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.12.003

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Soon, L. T., Wong, L. S., Kamarazaly, M. A., Saar, C. C., & Sheikh Ilmi, H. (2024). COMPARISON OF BIM-BASED QUANTITIES TAKE-OFF IN QUANTITY SURVEYING PROFESSION. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(32). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1499