ASSESSMENT ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING INEFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AMONG STAKEHOLDERS IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Wan Norizan Wan Ismail Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Hamimah Adnan College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SELANGOR BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Siti Sarah Mat Isa Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Norsyazwana Jenuwa Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA
  • Norhafizah Yusop Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PERAK BRANCH, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1452

Keywords:

Communication, Development, Infrastructure, Project Participants

Abstract

Communication serves as a foundation for the planning and development of infrastructure projects. Because the infrastructure projects are complex and involve multiple stakeholders, ineffective communication could significantly negatively impact the whole development process. Hence, this paper aims to determine the significant factors that lead to ineffective communication among project participants in infrastructure development in Malaysia and explore initiatives to address the problems. The research data were gathered via responses from a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews with Grade G7 contractors and consultant engineers who were involved in infrastructure development. The study starts by distributing questionnaires to the target population to determine the significant factors influencing the ineffectiveness of communication among the project participants. At the second stage, 28 industry practitioners were interviewed to gain their deeper insight on the initiatives to address the problems. The result revealed seven significant factors contributing to the communication ineffectiveness in infrastructure development in Malaysia. There were eight initiatives recommended to be taken by project participants to address the problems, namely, to channel the site problems to the right and authorized person/party, encourage a cooperative attitude towards achieving the project goal, avoid confrontational attitudes, provide timely feedback, create a harmonious and effective working environment, promote a no-blame culture, encourage respect for others, and keep written communication at all times. The outcome of the study could mitigate the impacts of ineffective communication in infrastructure planning and development by helping to ensure that all the participants involved are on the same page and aligned with project goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, A., & Othman, E. (2013). Challenges of mega construction projects in developing countries. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 5(1), 730-746. https://doi.org/10.5592/otmcj.2013.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5592/otmcj.2013.1.10

Adnan, H., Hashim, N., Mohd, N., Yusuwan, & Ahmad, N. (2012). Ethical Issues in the Construction Industry: Contractor’s Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35(December 2011),719-727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.142

Ali, N.A.N.A., Wilkinson, S., 2010. Modernising Construction Contract Drafting – A Plea for Good Sense. In: Proceedings of the 18th CIB World Building Congress, pp. 323–345

Al-Mayahi, H. T., Ismail, S., Wahab, M. H., Wan Mohd Rani, W. N. M., Che Amat, R. (2018). Architectural Practices of Project Communication Management in Iraq. Planning Malaysia, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i5.406

Aziz, R. F., & Abdel-Hakam, A. A. (2016). Exploring delay causes of road construction projects in Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(2), 1515–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.006

Chong, H. Y., & Zin, R. M. (2010). A case study into the language structure of construction standard form in Malaysia. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.008

De Araujo, V.A., Lima Jr. M.P., Biazzon, J.C., Vasconcelos, J.S., Munis, R.A., Morales, E.A.M., Cortez-Barbosa, J., Nogueira, C.L., Savi, A.F., Severo, E.T.D., Christoforo, A.L., Sorrentino, M., Lahr, F.A.R., Gava, M., Garcia, J.N. (2018): Machinery from Brazilian wooden housing production: size and overall obsolescence. BioResources, 13 (4): 8775–8786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.8775-8786

Desa, A., Kadir, N.B.A. and Yusooff, F. (2012) Waste Education and Awareness Strategy: Towards Solid Waste Management (SWM) Program at UKM. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 47-50.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.244

Famakin, I. O., Aje, I. O., & Ogunsemi, D. R. (2012). Assessment of success factors for joint venture construction projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 17(2), 153–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13664381211246606

Ismail, W. N. W., Adnan, H. & Ismail, N. A. A. (2021) International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12 No. 3 (2021) p. 227-235.

Ismail, W. N. W., Adnan, H., Azmi, W. F. W. M., Yusop, N., Isa, S. S. M., (2023). Factors Contributing to Delay of Interim Payment in Civil Engineering Projects. International Journal of Technology. 14(4), pp. 867-876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i4.3370

Krima, N. A., Wood, G., Ghassan, F. A., & Zedan, H. (2007). Assessing the performance of Libyan supervising engineers. Construction Management and Economics, 25(5), 509–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701247883

Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Morris, D. A. (2002). Build-Operate-Transfer-Type Procurement in Asian Megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(93) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(93)

Ling, F. Y. Y., Ke, Y., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Asce, M., & Wang, S. (2013). Key Relational Contracting Practices Affecting Performance of Public Construction Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(March), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000781

Marique, Y. (2013). Cooperation and competition in complex construction projects. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 5(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451311312829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451311312829

Mohd Fateh, M. A., Arshad, R. A., Ahmad Marzuki, S. M., Yusof, M. R. (2023). Improvements of the Communication Between Consultants and Contractor During Construction Phase in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 21(26). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1261

Rahmat, I. (2008). Managing Refurbishment Project. Shah Alam: University Publication Centre (UPENA).

Rameezdeen, R., Rodrigo, A., 2010. Textual Complexity of Standard Conditions used in the Construction Industry. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 13(1), pp. 1–12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v13i1.3046

Sambasivan, M., Soon, Y.W., 2007. Causes and Effects of Delays in Malaysian Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), pp. 517–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.007

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Shehu, Z., Endut, I. R., & Akintoye, A. (2014). Factors contributing to project time and hence cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 19(1), 55- 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-04-2013-0009

Yong, Y.C., Mustaffa, N.E., 2012. Analysis of Factors Critical to Construction Project Success In Malaysia. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Volume, 19(5), pp. 543–556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211259612

Yu, A. T. W., & Shen, G. Q. P. (2013). Problems and solutions of requirements management for construction projects under the traditional procurement systems. Facilities, 31(5/6), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771311307098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771311307098

Yuslim, S., Simanjuntak, M. R. A., & Lianto, F. (2023). Variables and Indicators to Measure the Performance of Sustainable Construction Project Management of City Park. Planning Malaysia, 21(25). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i25.1242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i25.1242

Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., & Md Yusof, A. (2013). An Overview of Comparison between Construction Contracts in Malaysia: The Roles and Responsibilities of Contract Administrator in Achieving Final Account Closing Success. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies (EET 2013), July 16-19, 2013, Rhodes Island, Greece, 34–41.

Zhang, L., & Fan, W. (2013). Improving performance of construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981311303044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981311303044

Zulkifli, U. K. Z. @, Zakaria, N., Salleh, H., Ali, A. S., & Yeah, C. L. (2011). the Comparative Study of International Standard Form of Building Contract (Fidic Conditions of Contracts for Construction - the New Red Book 1999) and Malaysian’S Standard Form of Building Contract (Pwd 203a). International Engineering Education Conference 2011, (December), 8.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Wan Ismail, W. N., Adnan, H., Mat Isa, S. S., Jenuwa, N., & Yusop, N. (2024). ASSESSMENT ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING INEFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AMONG STAKEHOLDERS IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(31). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1452