CONCEPTUALISING RESILIENCE LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES OF PADDY FARMERS TOWARDS MALAYSIA NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY AGENDA

Authors

  • Wan Mohammad Fazil Asli School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA, MALAYSIA
  • Suraiyati Rahman School of Housing, Building and Planning, UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1346

Keywords:

Livelihood Strategies, Resilience, Food Security, Paddy Farmers and framework

Abstract

The paddy production in Malaysia is characterised as small-scale agriculture, with modest plots of less than 2 ha and approximately 194,000 farmers employed. Majority of these farmers primarily rely on low-income agricultural production. This situation was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020, resulting in a 3.11% reduction (17.03 million tonnes) in the overall agricultural output across Southeast Asia. Rural communities are recognised as vulnerable and must adapt to these sudden changes. Despite the vulnerability and shocks experienced by rural communities, especially paddy farmers, the resilience of sustainable livelihood for staple food is the main issue to be taken into consideration. Sustainable livelihoods, which are closely related to rural development communities, serve as the primary force behind the preservation of the economic well-being in rural areas. The primary concern is the lack of imperative strategies to empower the paddy farmers and key stakeholders in the staple food ecosystem in facing uncertainties and shocks. The Sustainable Livelihood Framework has been adopted since 1992 in several countries and international organisations to eradicate poverty. However, this framework raised an issue as a generic concept and required further enhancement to visualise the response to uncertainties and shocks. The framework’s adaptability to climatic and non-climatic food insecurity is dependent on the adaptation strategies that are based on socioeconomic and cultural factors, such as household composition, gender, household asset distribution and external instructions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, A. S. A. F., Begum, H., Masud, M. M., Al-Amin, A. Q., & Filho, W. L. (2020). Agriculture insurance for disaster risk reduction: A case study of Malaysia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47(May 2019), 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101626

Department of Agriculture (2019). Statistics of Food Crops in Malaysia

Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of rural studies, 34, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004

Farrington, J., Carney, D., Ashley, C., & Turton, C. (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods in Practice: Early Applications of Concepts in Rural Areas. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives, 42(42), 189–200. http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/42.html

Firdaus, R. R., Leong Tan, M., Rahmat, S. R., & Senevi Gunaratne, M. (2020). Paddy, rice and food security in Malaysia: A review of climate change impacts. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1818373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1818373

Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (republished). Ecology and society, 21(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444

Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and society, 15(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420

Kasim, N. B. M., Ahmad, M. H. B., Shaharudin, A. B. B., Naidu, B. M., Ying, C. Y., & Aris, T. B. (2018). Food choices among Malaysian adults: Findings from Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS) 2003 and MANS 2014. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, 24(1).

Lim, L. L. (2020). The socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 in Malaysia: Policy review and guidance for protecting the most vulnerable and supporting enterprises. International Labour Organization.

Marzuki, A., & Jais, A. S. (2020). URBANISATION AND THE CONCERNS FOR FOOD SECURITY IN MALAYSIA. 18(3), 202–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.786

Morton, J. F. (2007). The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 104(50), 19680-19685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701855104

Pisano, U. (2012). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking. European sustainable development network (ESDN), 26, 50.

Ramaloo, P., Siwar, C., Liong, C. Y., & Isahak, A. (2018). Identification of strategies for urban agriculture development: A SWOT analysis. Planning Malaysia, 16(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.521

Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis.

Tapsir, S., ELINI, E. E., Roslina, A., Noorlidawati, A. H., HAFIZUDIN, Z. M., Hairazi, R., & Rosnani, H. (2019). Food security and sustainability: Malaysia agenda. Malaysian Applied Biology, 48(3), 1-9.

Thangiah, G., Said, M. A., Majid, H. A., Reidpath, D., & Su, T. T. (2020). Income inequality in quality of life among rural communities in Malaysia: A case for immediate policy consideration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238731

Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., & Wiskerke, J. (2012). An integrated perspective on rural regional learning. European Countryside, 4(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0010-y

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Asli, W. M. F., & Rahman, S. (2023). CONCEPTUALISING RESILIENCE LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES OF PADDY FARMERS TOWARDS MALAYSIA NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY AGENDA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(28). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1346

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>