ADDRESSING THE ASSESSMENT BIAS IN THE MALAYSIAN LOCAL PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Ezwan Bin-Bustamin Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate (SUPRE), UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Anuar Alias Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate (SUPRE), UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • Rubi Ahmad Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning & Real Estate (SUPRE), UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1287

Keywords:

Property tax assessment, assessment bias, ratio studies

Abstract

An assessment bias happens when an assessed property signifies intolerable proportionate between the assessed and market values; reflecting its uniformity within the valuation list and possessing inequity across the group of properties defined by the value. To correct the assessment bias, local government usually revaluates its valuation list. While most other developed countries perform the revaluation whenever the assessment’s performance is intolerable, the Malaysian existing law urges the revaluation to be as a quinquennial event. Globally, local assessors use the standard ratio studies promulgated by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) to measure and evaluate the severity of the assessment bias. Adopting the IAAO standard, this research had performed the ratio studies in Hang Tuah Jaya Municipality for the fiscal year of 2017. The research had revealed a significant assessment bias between the lower-value and higher-value properties and other significant property feature that associated with the assessment bias.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amos, D. (2019). A review of facilities management performance measurement. Property Management, 37(4), 490-511. doi: 10.1108/PM-08-2018-0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-08-2018-0051

Almy, R., Dornfest, A., & Kenyon, D. (2008). Fundamentals of tax policy

Birch, J. W., Sunderman, M. A., & Radetskiy, E. (2017). Reducing Vertical and Horizontal Inequity in Property Tax Assessments. Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 14(2), 73-83.

Board of Valuers, A., Estate Agents and Property Managers. (2019). Malaysian Valuation Standards Sixth Edition. Malaysia. Cheng, P. L. (1970). The Common Level of Assessment in Property Taxation. National Tax Journal, 23(1), 50-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791700

Cornia, G. C., & Slade, B. A. (2006). Horizontal Inequity in the Property Taxation of Apartment, Industrial, Office and Retail Properties. National Tax Journal, 59(1), 33-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2006.1.02

De Cesare, C. M., & Ruddock, L. (1998). A new approach to the analysis of assessment equity. Assessment Journal, 5(4), 57-69.

Denne, R. C. (2011). The PRB and other potential successors to the flawed PRD as a measure of vertical assessment inequity. Fair & Equitable, 9, 3-11.

Fleissig, A. R. (2018). Who benefits most from property assessment taxes? Evidence from Los Angeles County. Applied Economics Letters, 25(20), 1471-1474. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1430312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1430312

Gloudemans, R. J. (2011). The coefficient of price-related bias: A measure of vertical equity. Fair & Equitable, 9, 3-8.

Gloudemans, R. J., & Almy, R. (2011). Fundamentals of mass appraisal. Kansas City: IAAO.

Hodge, T. R., McMillen, D. P., Sands, G., & Skidmore, M. (2017). Assessment Inequity in a Declining Housing Market: The Case of Detroit. Real Estate Economics, 45(2), 237-258. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.12126IAAO. (2010). Standard on property tax policy. Kansas City: IAAO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12126

IAAO. (2010a). Standard on property tax policy. Kansas City: IAAO.

IAAO. (2010b). Standard on verification and adjustment of sales. Kansas City: IAAO.

IAAO. (2013). Standard on ratio studies. Kansas City: IAAO.

McMillen, D., & Singh, R. (2020). Assessment Regressivity and Property Taxation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 60(1-2), 155-169. doi: 10.1007/s11146-019-09715-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-019-09715-x

McMillen, D. P. (2011). Assessment regressivity: a tale of two Illinois counties. Land Lines, 23, 9-15. Mikesell, J. L. (1980). Property-Tax Reassessment Cycles - Significance for Uniformity and Effective Rates. Public Finance Quarterly, 8(1), 23-37. DOI: 10.1177/109114218000800102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218000800102

Paglin, M., & Fogarty, M. (1972). Equity and The Property Tax: A New Conceptual Focus. National Tax Journal, 25(4), 557-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791839

Sirmans, G. S., Diskin, B. A., & Friday, H. S. (1995). Vertical Inequity in The Taxation of Real Property. National Tax Journal, 48(1), 71-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789124

Downloads

Published

2023-07-26

How to Cite

Bin-Bustamin, E., Alias, A., & Ahmad, R. (2023). ADDRESSING THE ASSESSMENT BIAS IN THE MALAYSIAN LOCAL PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(27). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i27.1287