PUBLIC RENTAL HOUSING (PRH) OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND HOUSING PATHWAYS IN KUALA LUMPUR

Authors

  • Nurhayati Khair Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning and Real Estate (SUPRE), Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Ainoriza Mohd Aini Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning and Real Estate (SUPRE), Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Zafirah Al Sadat Zyed Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning and Real Estate (SUPRE), Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i24.1197

Keywords:

public rental housing, housing policies, housing pathways, operating policies

Abstract

The Malaysian Government’s vision is to provide Malaysians of all income levels accessibility to adequate, affordable, and quality housing, particularly those from the low-income group (B40). For several decades, the Malaysian Government has played an important role in the provision of low-cost public housing by building houses either for sale or rent. In Kuala Lumpur, the administration of low-cost public housing is managed by Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL). Recently, there has been a pressing need for more public rental houses in Kuala Lumpur, evident from the vast number of B40 applicants awaiting settlement. However, the number of vacant units for housing is very limited. The paper discusses the role of DBKL in shaping the public housing pathways by reviewing the current DBKL’s PPR Operational Policies. The paper is constructed based on policy review, as well as data from interviews with DBKL officials. The DBKL’s operational policies from the point of view of tenant “Enter” until “Exit” was mapped with the housing pathways. The study found a variety of operational policies that DBKL has implemented to ensure tenants’ successful transition in and out and are strongly influenced by the need to manage the waiting list and political pressure. The paper, which looks from the perspective of DBKL as a landlord, concludes with a preliminary recommendation on some ways DBKL can improve their tenancy management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, E., Leishman, C., Bentley, R., Pham, N. T. A., & Daniel, L. (2020). Social housing exit points, outcomes and future pathways: an administrative data analysis.

Bermingham, S. & Park, Y. (2013) ‘NSW public housing and AHO – Tenancy exits and subsequent assistance’, paper presented at the National Housing Conference, Adelaide, 30 October–3 November.

Clapham, D., Mackie, P., Orford, S., Thomas, I., & Buckley, K. (2014). The housing pathways of young people in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2016–2031. http://doi.org/10.1068/a46273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a46273

DBKL, Slide Pembentangan, Program Kawalan dan Penguatkuasaan, Jabatan Pembangunan Komuniti dan Kesejahteraan Bandar (2020)

Fattah, H. A., Badarulzaman, N., & Ali, K. (2020). Neighbourhood Quality Assessment: A View of Tenure Ownership and Mobility Decisions in Penang, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.712

Forrest R. (2013) Reflections. In: Chen J., Stephens M., Man Y. (eds) The Future of Public Housing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41622-4_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41622-4_17

Hwang, S., Lee, J., Yi, J. S., & Kim, M. (2019). Korean public rental housing for residential stability of the younger population: analysis of policy impacts using system dynamics. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 18(3), 180-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1615494

Iommi, S. (2011). The target efficiency problem in Italy’s housing Policy: The case of Tuscany. Housing Studies, 26(1), 41-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.512785

Jamaluddin, Z. (2005). Privatisation of squatters’ resettlement. UUM Press

Khazanah Research Institute, 2016. Making Housing Affordable. Kuala Lumpur.

Lang, R., & Roessl, D. (2013). The governance of co-operative housing: Current challenges and future perspectives. International Journal of Co-operative Management, 6(2), 8-12

Li, J. (2016). Housing Policies in Hong Kong, China and the People’s Republic of China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2768070

Baker, E., Leishman, C., Bentley, R., Pham, N. T. A., & Daniel, L. (2020). Social housing exit points, outcomes and future pathways: an administrative data analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri-3119901

Li, J., Stehlík, M., & Wang, Y. (2019). Assessment of barriers to public rental housing exits: Evidence from tenants in Beijing, China. Cities, 87, 153-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.09.019

Li, J., Wang, C. C. and Sun, J. (2017) ‘Empirical analysis of tenants’ intention to exit public rental housing units based on the Theory of Planned Behavior – The case of Wuhan, China’, Habitat International, vol. 69: 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.08.006

Malaysia. 2016. Eleventh Malaysia Plan (2016-2020). Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department

Powell, A., Meltzer, A., Martin, C., Stone, W., Liu, E., Flanagan, K., Muir, K. and Tually, S. (2019) The construction of social housing pathways across Australia, AHURI Final Report 316, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, http://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/316, doi:10.18408/ahuri-7118101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri-7118101

Rehda Institute, 2018, Affordable Housing The Game Plan Transformation

Shuid, S. (2016). The housing provision system in Malaysia. Habitat International, 54, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.021

-223.

Shuid, S., & Zamin, M. F. M. (2018). Maqasid Al-Syariah & Human Well-Being: A Study on Melaka’s Public Housing. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i6.478

Sohaimi, N. S., Abdullah, A., & Shuid, S. (2017). A review on housing pathways approach for young professionals housing affordability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 2222-6990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3056

Wei, L. (2012). A research on access and withdrawal mechanism for fair distribution of affordable housing. Southeast Academic Research, 3, 40–48.

Wiesel, I., & Pawson, H. (2015). Why do tenants leave social housing? Exploring residential and social mobility at the lowest rungs of Australia’s socio-economic DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00357.x

Wiesel, I., Pawson, H., Stone, W., Herath, S. and McNelis, S. (2014) Social Housing Exits: Incidence, Motivations and Consequences, AHURI Final Report No. 229, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/229.

Zhang, R. J. (2017). A Tale of Two Cities: Comparative Study of Public Housing Policies of Hong Kong and Singapore.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-10

How to Cite

Khair, N., Mohd Aini, A., & Zyed, Z. A. S. (2022). PUBLIC RENTAL HOUSING (PRH) OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND HOUSING PATHWAYS IN KUALA LUMPUR. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(24). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i24.1197