IMPACTS OF INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT (IRD) TOWARDS TRADITIONAL VILLAGE ECONOMY IN KETENGAH, TERENGGANU, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Taufek Mohd Hanapiah Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Noor Aimran Samsudin Research Group of Urban Design and Environmental, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Muhammad Farid Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agroscience, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF AGROSCIENCE MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i23.1162

Keywords:

Rural, Integrated Rural Development, Feasibility, Creative Index Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the anticipated impacts of an integrated economy on six (6) traditional villages in the District of Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia, which villages have undergone “Integrated Rural Development” (IRD). The IRD has promoted a continual intervention and collaboration process that involved external parties, including government agencies, to improve the rural local economy and the villagers’ quality of life. The villagers’ aspiration to improve their economic wealth was blended carefully with the preservation of local values through local distribution, thus reducing rural-urban incongruity. Alternatives were also sought to strengthen and use natural resources. The integrated economic sectors assessed in these villages were agriculture, livestock, aquaculture, small-and-medium entrepreneurs (SME) industries, and rural tourism. This paper seeks to evaluate the impacts of these economies on the concept of IRD by using Creative Index Analysis (C.I) in determining the best practice framework. By emphasising the principle of “best value for money”, CI was used to measure the value of anticipated impact, particularly the benefits that will be received by the people against the cost of development and operation for a period of its lifespan. A 1.0 creative index value refer to a rural area that has an economic integration potential and disparities that were overcome by the analysis. Most importantly, more than 78% of the 114 respondents from this area agreed with the project implementation. To ensure the impacts of the IRD project, the development framework proposes the consideration of at least three potential aspects within five years of implementation: training, new and existing development, and assistance in product marketing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong H.W. (1993). The local income and employment impact of Lancaster University, Urban Studies, 30 (9), pp. 1653-1668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320081641

Arshad, F. M., & Shamsudin, M. N. (1997). Rural development model in Malaysia.

Balm, G. J. (1996). Benchmarking and gap analysis: what is the next milestone? Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 3(4), pp. 28–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635779610153345

Bryden J., Watson R., Storey C. and van Alphen J. (1997). Community Involvement and Rural Policy, Edinburgh, the Scottish Office Central Research Unit, 90 p.

Economic Planning Unit (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas 2016-2020 Pertumbuhan Berpaksikan Rakyat. Percetakan Nasional, pp. 2-25, 9-23.

Gore T., Powell R. and Wells P. (2003). The Contribution of Community Businesses to the Rural Economy of Yorkshire and The Humber, Sheffield, Sheffield Hallam University, 86 p.

Gurel, E. and Tat, M. (2017). SWOT Analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832

Ilbery B., Bowler I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism, chapter 4, in The Geography of Rural Change, Ilbery B. (ed.), Harlow, Essex, Longman, pp. 57-84.

Johnson T. (2001). The rural economy in a new century, International Regional Science Review, 24 (1), pp. 21-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016001701761012953

Mahmood, I., Imadi, S., Shazadi, K., Gul, A., &Hakeem, K. (2016). Effects of Pesticides on Environment. Plant, Soil and Microbes, 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3_13

Marsden T., Bristow G. (2000). Progressing integrated rural development: A framework for assessing the integrative potential of sectoral policies, Regional Studies, 34 (5), pp. 455-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050058701

Pepper D. (1999). The integration of environmental sustainability considerations into EU development policy: A case study of the LEADER initiative in Northern Ireland, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42 (2), pp. 167-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569911208

Pickton, D. W., & Wright, S. (1998). What's swot in strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7(2), 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(199803/04)7:2<101::AID-JSC332>3.0.CO;2-6

Tony Gore & Ryan Powell & Peter Wells, 2006. "The contribution of rural community businesses to integrated rural development: “Local services for local people”," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 80, pages 29-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2006.1011

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Mohd Hanapiah, T., Samsudin, N. A., & Farid, M. (2022). IMPACTS OF INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT (IRD) TOWARDS TRADITIONAL VILLAGE ECONOMY IN KETENGAH, TERENGGANU, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(23). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i23.1162