CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENT CARRYING CAPACITY FRAMEWORK: A CASE STUDY OF PULAU PERHENTIAN MARINE PARK INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Nadia Mohd Nasir International Institute for Halal Research and Training (INHART)
  • Mansor Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Lukman Hakim Mahamod Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Rashidi Othman Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.231

Keywords:

Institutional framework, government agencies, tourism key players, sustainable tourism

Abstract

The environmental quality at Pulau Perhentian Marine Park is degrading day by day. Many studies have been done in order to support sustaining the tourist sites such as having limits in development and tourist arrival, or better known as carrying capacity. Despite the existence of many agencies whose job scope is related to Pulau Perhentian, poor implementation of the guideline is resulting in degrading environmental quality of the park. This paper looks at the roles and functions of each government agencies related to Pulau Perhentian. The outcome of this paper is the analysis of the current roles and responsibilities of the agencies and where are the gaps that can be filled in order to promote sustainable tourism in Pulau Perhentian.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coccossis, H., & Mexa, A. (2004). The challenge of tourism carrying capacity assessment: theory and practice. Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Cinner, J. (2005). Socioeconomic factors influencing customary marine tenure in the Indo-Pacific. Ecology and society, 10(1), 1-14.

Department of Marine Park (2016). Tourist arrivals and receipts to Malaysia -facts & figures. Retrieved August 16, 2016 from http://www.dmpm.nre.gov.my/ data_pelawat.html? uweb=jtl.

Kaza, S. (1988). Community involvement in marine protected areas. Oceans, 31(1), 7581.

Kenchington, R. A. (1988). Managing reefs and inter-reef environments and resources for sustained exploitive extractive and recreational uses. In Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium (pp. 81-87), Australia.

Nurul I. G.., Noh K. M., & Tai S. Y. (2013). Assessing environmental damage to marine protected area: a case of Perhentian Marine Park in Malaysia. Journal of Agriculture Science, 5(8), 132-141.

Rees, W. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4, 121-130.

Singh R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9, 189-212.

White, A. T. (1986). Marine reserves: how effective as management strategies for Philippines, Indonesian and Malaysian coral reef environments? Ocean Management, 10, 137-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0302-184X (86)90019-3.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-12

How to Cite

Mohd Nasir, N., Ibrahim, M., Mahamod, L. H., & Othman, R. (2017). CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENT CARRYING CAPACITY FRAMEWORK: A CASE STUDY OF PULAU PERHENTIAN MARINE PARK INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.231