CONCEPTUALIZING PLACE-BASED AGING: AN ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS FOR MALAYSIAN SENIORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2060Keywords:
Ageing in place, assistive technology, quality of life, age-friendly environment, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)Abstract
This research examines aging in place among older persons in Malaysia, emphasizing the interconnected roles of assistive technology, quality of life, and age-friendly surroundings in facilitating this process. With Malaysia's senior demographic anticipated to rise from 10.3% in 2020 to 15.3% by 2030, the necessity for appropriate methods to facilitate aging in place has become increasingly pressing. This study analyzes survey data from 499 participants aged 60 to 75, investigating the impact of assistive technology on physical health, psychological well-being, and social involvement, revealing substantial improvements in quality of life. Furthermore, age-friendly surroundings enhance autonomy by alleviating environmental obstacles. Nonetheless, adoption obstacles, such as budgetary limitations and insufficient technological expertise, hinder the efficacy of assistive devices for certain seniors. This article emphasizes the importance of a balanced strategy that combines technological and human support, providing guidance for policymakers to create interventions that preserve the autonomy and dignity of older individuals in Malaysia.
Downloads
References
Abdul Mutalib, M., Kamaruzaman, N. A.-F., & Abdullah, N. A. (2023). ELDERLY EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING: LEGAL AND SHARIAH PERSPECTIVES. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(2), 230-242. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.405
Abdullah, J. M., Ismail, A., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2024). Healthy Ageing in Malaysia by 2030: Needs, Challenges and Future Directions. Malays J Med Sci, 31(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.1
Ahmed, M. N., M Hassan, N., & Morghany, E. (2023). Towards elderly-friendly home environments in Egypt: exploring elderly challenges, needs, and adaptive strategies to promote aging in place. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 51(4), 260-286.
Ahn, M., Kwon, H. J., & Kang, J. (2020). Supporting aging-in-place well: Findings from a cluster analysis of the reasons for aging-in-place and perceptions of well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(1), 3-15.
Aini, A. M., Murni, N., & Abd Aziz, W. N. A. W. (2016). Housing aspirations of the elderly in Malaysia: A comparison of urban and rural areas. Journal of design and built environment, 16(2).
Azmi, A., Aning, P., Wan Abd Aziz, W. N. A., Juhari, N. H., Khair, N., Mentaza Khan, P. A., & Sivanathan, S. (2021). ASSESSING THE STRATA HOUSING ATTRIBUTES FOR ELDERLY TO AGE IN PLACE IN KLANG VALLEY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.990
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2025a). Active ageing in urban environments: a reflexive critique of simplistic binaries. Journal of Urban Design, 30(2), 153-155.
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2025b). Ageing in place in urban environments: building collaborative organisations for later life. European Journal of Ageing, 22(1), 1-11.
Che Amani Nurfadhilah, & Kahar Rojanah, I. R., Hasbullah Muslihah (2021). Elder Financial Abuse Experience: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Older Persons in Malaysia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 11(8), 479-498.
Department of Statistics Malaysia, D. o. S. M. (2023). Current Population Estimates, Malaysia, 2023. Department of Statistics Malaysia(DOSM) official website: Department of Statistics Malaysia(DOSM) Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/current-population-estimates-malaysia----2023
E, J., Xia, B., Chen, Q., Buys, L., Susilawati, C., & Drogemuller, R. (2024). Impact of the Built Environment on Ageing in Place: A Systematic Overview of Reviews. Buildings, 14(8).
Egea de Haro, A., & Navarro Gómez, C. (2024). Local governments and aging policies: An analysis of municipalities in the region of Madrid. Papers (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), 109(1), e3219-e3219.
Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The Importance of Social Connectedness in Building Age-Friendly Communities. Journal of Aging Research, 2012(1), 173247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/173247
Fathkabir, M., & İnalhan, G. (2024). Fractal Analyzes of Age-Friendly Transportation System: A Comparison of the Istanbul Kadikoy and Besiktas. Senex: Yaşlılık Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 17-30.
Frochen, S., & Pynoos, J. (2017). Housing for the elderly: Addressing gaps in knowledge through the lens of age-friendly communities. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 160-177.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hatcher, D., Chang, E., Schmied, V., & Garrido, S. (2019). Exploring the Perspectives of Older People on the Concept of Home. Journal of Aging Research, 2019(1), 2679680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2679680
Horne, R. (2023). 2 Employment and social trends by region. World Employment and Social Outlook, 2023(1), 57-85.
Hung, L.-W., Kempen, G. I. J. M., & De Vries, N. K. (2010). Cross-cultural comparison between academic and lay views of healthy ageing: a literature review. Ageing and Society, 30(8), 1373-1391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000589
Khan, A. R., & Tahir, I. (2014). Influence of Social Factors to the Quality of Life of the Elderly in Malaysia. Open Medicine Journal, 1(1).
Kim, S. (2024). Effects of Perceived Accessibility to Living Infrastructure on Positive Feelings Among Older Adults. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 1025. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/11/1025
Lai, M.-M., Lein, S.-Y., Lau, S.-H., & Lai, M.-L. (2016). Modeling Age-Friendly Environment, Active Aging, and Social Connectedness in an Emerging Asian Economy. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, 2052380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2052380
Makhtar, A., Ab Ghani, N. N., Elias, S. M. S., & Ludin, S. M. (2023). Social support and associated factors among family caregivers of older people in North-East Peninsular Malaysia. Belitung Nursing Journal, 9(1), 69.
Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919878341.
Mohamad Bohari, A. A., Julaihi, F. A., Kipli, K., Azman, M. A., Amirul, S. R., & Hu, X. (2024). Retirement Village Design Features: Generation X's Expectation. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(2).
Mohd Tobi, S. U., Fathi, M. S., & Amaratunga, D. (2018). AGEING IN PLACE FRAMEWORK AS REFERENCE GUIDE FOR HOUSING IN MALAYSIA: LANDED PROPERTY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.417
Moscou-Jackson, G., Gummi, S., Clauser, S. B., & Arora, N. K. (2019). ASSESSMENT OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH GAPS TO PROMOTE AGING IN PLACE: A STAKEHOLDER-DRIVEN APPROACH. Innovation in Aging, 3(Supplement_1), S601-S602.
Noor, S., Isa, F. M., & Nor, L. M. (2020). Ageing care centre women entrepreneur: a silver bullet for ageing tsunami in Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 12(1).
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., Nieboer, M. E., Aarts, S., van der Voort, C. S., Rijnaard, M. D., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2017). Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0582-5
Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 83(4), 235-248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
Pynoos, J., Steinman, B. A., & Nguyen, A. Q. D. (2010). Environmental Assessment and Modification as Fall-Prevention Strategies for Older Adults. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 26(4), 633-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2010.07.001
Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 553-572.
Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32, 219-235.
Thakur, N., & Han, C. Y. (2021). A review of assistive technologies for activities of daily living of elderly. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12183.
Tobi, S. M., Fathi, M., & Amaratunga, D. (2017). Ageing in place, an overview for the elderly in Malaysia. AIP conference proceedings,
Vitman Schorr, A., & Khalaila, R. (2018). Aging in place and quality of life among the elderly in Europe: A moderated mediation model. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 77, 196-204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.009
Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H.-C., & Nebeker, C. (2019). Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives. Healthcare, 7(2), 60. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/7/2/60
Yap, Y.-Y., Tan, S.-H., & Choon, S.-W. (2022). Elderly's intention to use technologies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(1), e08765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08765
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
