INTEGRATING ISLAMIC REASONING INTO CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING

Authors

  • Shahir Akram Hassan Centre for Islamic Development Management Studies (ISDEV), UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Fareed Ahmad Malik Centre for Islamic Development Management Studies (ISDEV), UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Shukri Hanapi Centre for Islamic Development Management Studies (ISDEV), UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Wan Mohd Khairul Firdaus Wan Khairuldin Research Institute of Islamic Product and Malay Civilization (INSPIRE), UNIVERSITI SULTAN ZAINAL ABIDIN
  • Abdul Hanis Embong Research Institute of Islamic Product and Malay Civilization (INSPIRE), UNIVERSITI SULTAN ZAINAL ABIDIN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2040

Keywords:

Mantiq, Reasoning, Research Methodology, Planning and Development, Islamic Economics, Maqasid

Abstract

While there is growing research focusing on the higher objectives (Maqasid) and ethical underpinnings of Islamic economics, the methodological significance of reasoning within the field remains underexplored. This study examines the assimilation of classical Islamic reasoning methods into contemporary planning development within the framework of Islamic economic research methodology. It explores the classification and epistemological basis to emphasize the importance of classical Islamic reasoning methods in bridging Shariah-based ethical principles with contemporary Islamic economic research framework. The qualitative review uses exploratory methods, juristic opinions (fatwas), and conceptual models through thematic approach and hermeneutic analysis in an integrated study framework. Drawing upon existing empirical studies on Zakat reforms and regulation of digital Islamic finance and cryptocurrencies, this study illustrates the practical usage of Islamic-based reasoning methods, revealing how various reasoning approaches, including Maqasid-based reasoning, collectively ensure Shariah compliance and ethical orientation in contemporary scenarios.  Findings reveal a fragmented yet evolving reasoning landscape, where researchers inconsistently utilize deductive reasoning (from Islamic texts), empirical induction, jurisprudential comparison, and reasoning based on higher purposes, lacking clarity in methodological justifications. Outlining the importance of methodological reflexivity and the Maqasidi approach in contemporary planning framework, this study concludes that structured, transparent, and ethically anchored integrated reasoning approach, is essential for advancing Islamic economic research. This integrated approach advances ethics based, applied, and context-relevant development planning ensuring equitable resource distribution and financial inclusion initiatives for social welfare. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addas, W. A. J. (2008). Methodology of economics: Secular versus Islamic. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:8264

Ahmad Damanhuri. (2006). Idah al-Mubham fi al-Ma’ani al-Sullam. Maktabah al-Ma’arif.

Al-Quwasini, H. D. (n.d.). Syarh ‘ala matn al-Sullam fi al-Mantik. Maktabah Dar al-Iman.

Al-Shanqiti, M. B. M. B. M. F. (2007). Al-Dhau al-Masyriq ala Sullam al-Mantiq. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Asutay, M. (2012, December 31). The socio-ethical failure in Islamic banking and finance. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1617341

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah: A beginner’s guide. In Occasional Papers Series (Vol. 14). The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and the economic challenge. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective.

Choudhury, M. A. (2011). Islamic economics and finance: An epistemological inquiry. In Contributions to economic analysis. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0573-8555(2011)0000291031

El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Furqani, H., & Haneef, M. A. (2012). Theory appraisal in Islamic economic methodology: Purposes and criteria. Humanomics, 28(4), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661211277335

Ghazali, N. A., Sipan, I., Abas, F. N., & Yaacob, A. C. (2021). The methodological structure for legal research: A perspective from the Malaysian land law and Islamic law. Planning Malaysia, 19. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.987

Habti, D. (2011). Reason and revelation for an Averroist pursuit of convivencia and intercultural dialogue. Policy Futures in Education, 9(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.1.81

Hantrais, L. (2014). Methodological pluralism in international comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.892656

Hassan, S. A. (2018). Reasoning method: An analysis from the Islamic perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i11/4974

Ibrahim, M. A., Mat, S. R., Noor, L. M., & Arifin, A. (2017). The integration of Naqli and Aqli for Chemistry course: A study on Tamhidi students’ expectations. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370400

Kahf, M. (2004). Shari'ah and historical aspects of zakat and awqaf [Background paper]. Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank.

Khan, M. A. (2017). Methodology of Islamic economics: From Islamic teachings to Islamic economics. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 5(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.26414/tujise.2018.5.1.35-61

Latif, H. M., Mohamed, N., Donyavi, S., & Samsudin, N. S. (2024). Qualitative research challenges in assessing rainwater harvesting implementation fidelity for reliable data. Planning Malaysia, 22. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1463

Malik, S. A. (2025). Science as divine signs: Al-Sanūsī’s framework of legal (sharʿī), nomic (ʿādī), and rational (aqli) judgements. Religions, 16(5), 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050549

Murtadha Mutahhari. (2011). Al-Mantiq. Dar al-Walaa.

Naz, S., & Nazir, N. (2024). Examining the adoptability of cryptocurrency in the Islamic financial system: Perspectives from Shariah scholars. Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Islamic Economics, 37(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.37-2.4

Obaidullah, M., & Khan, T. (2008). Islamic microfinance development: Challenges and initiatives. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1506073

Quraishi-Landes, A., & Kamali, M. H. (2000). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Religion, 15, 385–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051529

Rafikov, I., & Akhmetova, E. (2020). Methodology of integrated knowledge in Islamic economics and finance: Collective ijtihād. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 12(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijif-02-2019-0034

Rafique, R. (2025). Formal logical arguments in Islamic law. Open Journal of Philosophy, 15(1), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2025.151010

Rahman, M. M. (2024). Institutional zakat management in Bangladesh: Collection and distribution practices. AZKA International Journal of Zakat & Social Finance, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.51377/azjaf.vol5no2.192

Siddiqi, M. N. (2011). Islamization of knowledge. American Journal of Islam and Society, 28(3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v28i3.335

Syukriadi Sambas, H. (2003). Mantik kaidah berpikir Islami. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Hassan, S. A., Ahmad Malik, F., Hanapi , M. S., Wan Khairuldin, W. M. K. F., & Embong, A. H. (2026). INTEGRATING ISLAMIC REASONING INTO CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(42). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2040