ADAPTIVE REUSE, COMMUNITY, AND CULTURE: SYMBOLIC INTERACTION AND THE SACRED SPACE OF HERITAGE BUILDINGS IN PALOPO CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1858Keywords:
Adaptive Reuse, Heritage Architecture, Historical Urban Landscape, Nusantara ArchitectureAbstract
The buildings of the Luwu Kingdom, including the Post Office, Deputy Mayor’s Office, government offices, places of worship, and tombs, hold significant value as heritage architecture in Palopo City. The spatial distribution of these buildings is a defining characteristic of the city’s conservative areas. The typology of heritage buildings reflects a distinct architectural identity and shares connections with similar structure elsewhere. Syntactic relationships exist between these heritage buildings, reinforcing their historical and cultural significance. However, the government’s efforts to preserve and manage these historical structures, despite their high educational value, remain inadequate. In contrast, the local community actively engages with these heritage buildings, both in their use and in academic or cultural studies. The research employed qualitative methods, adopting symbolic interactionist research paradigm. The findings show that heritage architecture carries meanings derived both from their building themselves and from the people who interact with them. The spatial hierarchy of Palopo City consists of the Tana Bangkala, Lalebata, and Tana Tekko areas, all of which are integral to the city’s Historical Urban Landscape (HUL). The Tana Bangkala area contains a site that functions as a profane space for the community. The Lalebata area serves as a governmental space, while the Tana Tekko area is a sacred space characterized by the tombs or mausoleums. The spatial arrangement of these areas reflects a cosmological structure. Additionally, Tana Tekko and its surrounding context share similarities with a Mausoleum in Gowa, while the the kingdom’s architectural context is connected to Malay architecture across the archipelago.
Downloads
References
Alauddin, K., Najwa, F., Nusa, M., Baharuddin, M. N., Sabrizaa, M., Rashid, A., & Ramli, R. R. (2022). The Application of Green Adaptive Reuse of Historical Buildings in Unesco Cities. In Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners (Vol. 20, pp. 184–195). https://www.planningmalaysia.org/index.php/pmj/article/view/1137
Ariannia, N., Naseri, N., & Yeganeh, M. (2023). Cognitive-emotional feasibility of the effect of visual quality of building form on promoting the sense of place attachment (Case study: Cultural iconic buildings of Iran’s contemporary architecture). Frontiers of Architectural Research, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.10.002
Augustiniok, N., Houbart, C., Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2025). Adaptive reuse of built heritage: Conserving and designing with values. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 15(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2023-0068
Azra, A. (1994). Jaringan Ulama: Timur Tengah dan Kepulauan Nusantara abad XVII dan XVIII: Melacak akar-akar pembaruan pemikiran islam di Indonesia. Mizan.
Chalmers, A. F. (1983). Apa itu yang dinamakan ilmu? Hata mitra.
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. In British Journal of Educational Studies (Vol. 42, Issue 4). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121684
Ebrahimi, A. N., Gherehbeiglu, M., & Farshchian, A. H. (2017). The Characters and Meaning of Third Place in Historical Urban Space of Iran. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 4(4), 168. https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v4i4.3661
Hamka. (1982). Dari Perbendaharaan Lama. Pustaka Panjimas.
Koentjaraningrat. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Langston, C. (2011). Green Adaptive Reuse: Issues and Strategies for the Built Environment. In D. D. Wu (Ed.), Modeling Risk Management in Sustainable Construction (pp. 199–209). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Laurens, J. M. (2005). Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia (Vol. 42). PT Grasindo. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=Ltvj89G2AP4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA172&dq=joyce+marcella&ots=_yvYqYIjYn&sig=7okyhG4zK5paoIJjZ5XK7eF_F9c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=joyce marcella&f=false
Lobo, F. S. (2016). Crisis of Meaning, Crisis of Form (Vol. 42, Issue 1). University of London.
Mead, G. H. (2018). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Stand Point of A Social Behaviorist (in Indonesia). Forum (Group Relasi Inti Media).
Parsaee, M., Parva, M., & Karimi, B. (2015). Space and place concepts analysis based on semiology approach in residential architecture. HBRC Journal, 11(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.001
Sutrisno, M. (2017). Text Design as Icon and Culture Representation. 1st ICON-ARCCADE 2017 (International Conference on Art, Craft, Culture and Design).
Sutrisno, M., Sudaryono, & Sarwadi, A. (2018). Sacred Spaces: An Ethnosemiotics Study on The Ancient Center of Palopo City. SMART: Seminar on Architecture Research and Technology, 3, 53–64. https://smartfad.ukdw.ac.id/index.php/smart/article/view/20
Sutrisno, M., Syuaib, M., Nuryuningsih, & Yudhitya, A. G. (2021). Community self-organization system: Paradigm shift and strategy in preserving city history. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 780(1), 12060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/780/1/012060
van Laar, B., Greco, A., Remøy, H., Gruis, V., & Hamida, M. B. (2025). Towards desirable futures for the circular adaptive reuse of buildings: A participatory approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106259
Zakariya, K., Tukiman, I., Nizarudin, N. D., & Harun, N. Z. (2025). Community, Culture, and Conservation: Mapping the Biocultural, Landscape Resources of Sungai Tembus, Seberang Perang for Tourism. Journal of The Malaysian Institute of Planners, 23(1), 273–287. https://www.planningmalaysia.org/index.php/pmj/article/view/1678.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.