FRAMING THE ‘SOFT PART’ IN LIVEABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD: A PERSPECTIVE FROM MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1833Keywords:
Social Dimension, Liveable, NeighbourhoodAbstract
A socially cohesive society is widely recognised as a vital component of the "soft part" of liveability in neighbourhoods, fostering a sense of belonging through active engagement, mutual respect, and strong community interactions. This intangible dimension significantly influences residents' community experience and participation within their living environments. This study aims to identify the social dimension aspect and attributes that contribute to the development of liveable neighbourhoods within Malaysia’s housing sector. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates qualitative insights obtained through the Fuzzy Delphi technique, which was used to achieve expert consensus among 14 selected professionals and quantitative data derived from community perceptions in 10 neighborhoods identified by local authorities as high in liveability. The experts were selected based on criteria including academic publications in urban planning and housing, professional experience in town planning and development, and recognition for cities with high liveability ratings in Malaysia. Community perceptions were gathered from residents in neighborhoods with the highest liveability indices. The findings validate key social aspects such as density, demographic structure, lifestyle, social, local preferences, and cultural identity as critical features of liveable neighborhoods. This research provides valuable insights to inform future planning, development, and policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the social dimension of liveability in Malaysian urban environments.
Downloads
References
Alias, Z., Abdol Ghani, M. R., Saad, M., Abdullah, M., & Mohamed Mohan, N. M. (2025). EXAMINING MALAYSIA'S LOW-INCOME HOUSING ENVIRONMENT: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING ENVIRONMENT'S IMPACT ON RESIDENTS' ATTITUDES AND QUALITY OF LIFE. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(35). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i35.1661
Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social sustainability and urban form: Evidence from five British cities. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2125–2142.
Brueckner, J., & Largey, A. (2008). Social interaction and urban sprawl. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.002
Castillo, A. (2016). The Second International Conference on Best Practices in World Heritage: People and Communities. In S. Doempke (Ed.), The UNESCO World Heritage and the role of Civil Society (pp. 76–79).
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300.
Department of Town and Country Planning (PLANMalaysia), The Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2016). Garis Panduan Perancangan Perumahan.
Elvas, S., & Moniz, M. J. V. (2012). Sentimento de comunidade, qualidade e satisfação de vida. Análise Psicológica, 28(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.312
Ghahramanpouri, A., Abdullah, A. S., Sedaghatnia, S., & Lamit, H. (2015). Urban Social Sustainability Contributing Factors in Kuala Lumpur Streets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 368–376.
Ghani, S. A. (2012). Sustainable Urban Neighbourhoods: The Need To Consider Residents' Satisfaction. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development.
Hashim, H. (2005). Harmonious Community Living in Urban Neighbourhoods: A Case of Central Shah Alam. 8th International Conference of the Asian Planning Schools Association, April.
Hathaway, Z. (2013). Neighborhood Identity and Sustainability: A Comparison Study of Two Neighborhoods in Portland, Oregon. Portland State University.
Hosseini, F. (2016). Neighbourhood social and physical disorders and adolescents' stress in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. University of Malaya.
Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2011). Social sustainability and neighbourhood design: An investigation of residents' satisfaction in Delhi. Local Environment, 16(9), 849–870.
Khorasani, M., & Zarghamfard, M. (2018). Analyzing the Impacts of Spatial Factors on Livability of Peri-Urban Villages. Social Indicators Research, 136(2), 693–717.
Lloyd, K., Fullagar, S., & Reid, S. (2016). Where is the 'Social' in Constructions of 'Liveability'? Exploring Community, Social Interaction and Social Cohesion in Changing Urban Environments. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118374
McMillan, D. W., & George, D. M. C. (1986). Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
Mary L. Ohmer, Claudia Coulton, Darcy A. Freedman, Joanne L. Sobeck, and Jaime Booth. (2019). Measures of Community and Neighbourhood Research.
Neamtu, B. (2012). Measuring the social sustainability of urban communities: The role of local authorities. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 37(1), 112–127.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Relevance of Social Research (vol. 8). http://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Power, A. (2004). Neighbourhood management and the future of urban areas. Power, January.
Roslan, N., Marzbali, M. H., Abdullah, A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2025). GIS ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD ENVIRONMENT DETERMINANTS THAT INFLUENCE WALKABILITY IN PENANG, MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(35). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i35.1675
Vergunst, P. (2003). Liveability and ecological land use [PhD dissertation]. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Woodcraft, S. (2012). Social Sustainability and New Communities: Moving from Concept to Practice in the UK. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 29–42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.