A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF A MODEL ON THE DECISION TO IMPLEMENT TELEWORKING IN THE JAPANESE BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Authors

  • Abdul Azeez Kadar Hamsa Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
  • Masao Miura SHIBA URA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JAPAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v4i1.53

Keywords:

Teleworking, ICT, Model, Japanese Organizations

Abstract

Teleworking, an alternative form of work arrangement, has gained very little significance in the present information era, as otherwise expected, in modem Japan. Existence of many factors would be directly responsible for the slow growth of teleworking in Japan. This paper highlights few significant factors responsible for the decision to accept teleworking as an alternate work arrangement as expressed by the managers of different business organizations in the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan Area (GTMA). These factors include but not limited to: organizational values, advantages of teleworking, performance evaluation, strategically measures and information technology requirements. A logistic regression model was developed to test the significance of these factors against the decision to implement teleworking. Finally, conclusions were also drawn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adolph I. Katz. 1987. “The Management, Control and Evaluation of a Telecommuting Project: A Case Studyâ€, Information and Management 13, pp. 179-190.

Field, A. 2000. Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows, Sage publications Ltd.

EPA. 2000. The effect of information technology on productivity: in search of Japan’s “New Economyâ€, Economic Planning Agency (EPA), http://www.epa.go.ip/2000/f/1031f-seisakukoka4-e/main.html

MPT 2000. “Statistics of telecommunications, Ministry of Post and Telecommunication (MPT)â€, http://www.mpt.go.jp/

Christensen, K. 1990. “Remote control: How to make telecommuting payoff for your companyâ€, PC Computing, Vol. 3, No.2, pp. 90-94

Cross T.B. & Raizman, M. 1986. Telecommuting: The future technology of work, Homewood, IL: Dow Jones Irwin.

Hobbs, D and Armstrong, J. 1998. “An experimental study of social and psychological aspects of teleworkingâ€, Industrial Management & Data Systems, pp. 214-218, MCB University Press.

Forester, T. 1989. The myth of the electronic cottage, In T. Forester (Ed.), Computers in the human context, Cambridge, MIT Press, MA, pp. 213-227.

Gillespie, A. Richardson, R. and Comford, J. 1995. Review of telework in Britain: Implications for Public Policy, CURDS, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, February.

Gordon, G & Kelly, M. 1986. Telecommuting: How to make it work for you and your company, Englbwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

Haddon, L and Lewis, A. 1994. “The experience of teleworking: An Annotated Reviewâ€, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 5, No. l,pp. 193-223.

Handy, C. 1995. Trust and the virtual organization, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 31-32.

Huws, U. Honey, S. Morris, S. 1996. Teleworking and Rural Development, Rural Research Report No. 27, The Rural Development Commission.

Kraut, R. 1987. Predicting the use of technology: The case of telework. In R. Kraut (Ed.), Technology and the transformation of white-collar work, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Marija J. Norusis. 1999. SPSS Regression Models 10.0, a software manual, SPSS Inc.

Nicole B. Ellison. 1999. Social Impacts: New Perspectives on Telework, Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 338-356.

Olson, M.H. 1989. Telework: Effects of changing work patterns in time and space. Chapter 10 in Information Society and Spatial Structure, ed. H. Emste and C. Jaeger. London: Belhaven.

Olson, M.H. 1988. Corporate culture and the homeworker. In K. Christensen (Ed.), The new era of home-based work: Directions and policies, Boulder, Westview, CO, pp. 126-134.

Orlikowski, W. 1996. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective, Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 63-92.

Mokhtarian P L. and Koji Sato. 1994. “A Comparison of the Policy, Social and Cultural Contexts for Telecommuting in Japan and the United Statesâ€, Social Science Computer Review Vol. 12, No. 4.

Perin, C. 1991. The moral fabric of the office: Panopticon discourse and schedule flexibility, In P. Tolbert & S. Barley (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Greenwich, CT, pp. 243-270.

Pratt, J. 1984. Home teleworking: A study of its pioneers, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25, pp. 1-14.

Stohl, C. 1995. Organizational communication: Connectedness in action, Thousand Oaks, Sage, CA.

Suomi, R. 1997. Management Values and Telework, Second International Workshop on Telework, Vol II, Work and Organizational Research Centre.

Wendy A. Spinks. 1991. Satellite and resort offices in Japan, Transportation, Vol. 18, pp. 343-363.

Downloads

Published

2006-11-30

How to Cite

Kadar Hamsa, A. A., & Miura, M. (2006). A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF A MODEL ON THE DECISION TO IMPLEMENT TELEWORKING IN THE JAPANESE BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v4i1.53