TRANSFORMING HERITAGE BUILDING FOR COMMERCIALISATION

Authors

  • Prihatmanti Rani Interior Architecture Department CIPUTRA UNIVERSITY SURABAYA INDONESIA
  • Cantika Putri Interior Architecture Department CIPUTRA UNIVERSITY SURABAYA INDONESIA
  • Adeline Devina Interior Architecture Department CIPUTRA UNIVERSITY SURABAYA INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i3.304

Keywords:

Adaptive reuse, heritage building, commercialisation, transformation

Abstract

Adaptive reuse is known as one of the conservation methods to prevent the building from being abandoned, dilapidated, as well as to halt further deterioration of the fabrics, both in interior and exterior. Surabaya has a number of Dutch colonial buildings as evidence of the Dutch settlements for 350 years. The aesthetic value, location and the historical significance of the buildings have made the proprietors conserving those buildings and reusing them as commercial spaces. In this research, two prominent Dutch-colonial mansions have been chosen as the research objects. Those buildings have been transformed into an upscale dining place in Surabaya, Indonesia. Based on the local regulation for heritage building conservation, the designated buildings have adhered to the conservation regulations. However, in some parts, alterations were still discovered and not according to the original of the building. These changes were purposely done in order to accommodate the business owners’ need. Therefore, this paper aims to review the transformation of heritage building and the compliance to the regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armitage, L., & Irons, J. (2013). The values of built heritage. Property Management, 31(3), 246-259. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02637471311321487

Australian ICOMOS (1999). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for places of cultural significance (pp. 2-5). Victoria: Australia ICOMOS Incorporated.

Chen, A., Peng, N., & Hung, K. P. (2015). The effects of luxury restaurant environments on diners’ emotions and loyalty. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(2), 236-260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2013-0280

Danardi, R. W., Antariksa, & Hariyani, S. (2010). Pelestarian lingkungan dan bangunan kuno di koridor Jalan Rajawali Kota Surabaya. Arsitektur e-Journal, 3(2).

Handinoto (1996). Perkembangan kota dan arsitektur kolonial Belanda di Surabaya 1870-1940. Surabaya: Penerbit Andi.

Heung, V. C. S., & Gu, T. (2012). Influence of restaurant atmospherics on patron satisfaction and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1167-1177. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.02.004

Kwanda, T. (2011). The morphological framework of the Chinese and the European districts in Surabaya, 1787-2005. DIMENSI, 38(1), 1-14.

Pimonsathean, Y. (2002). Current issues concerning adaptive re-use in the conservation of urban cultural heritage. RC: Revista de Cultura = Review of Culture. 4.

Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Boston, Harvard Business School Press

Prianto, E., Bonneaud, F., Depecker, P., & Peneau, J-P. (2000). Tropical-humid architecture in natural ventilation efficient point of view: A reference of traditional architecture in Indonesia. International Journal on Architectural Science, 1(2), 80-95.

Song, J. (2010). Retail design and sensory experience: Design inquiry of complex reality.

Proceeding of the International Conference Design and Complexity (pp. 120126). Montreal, Canada: Design Research Society.

UNESCO (1972, November). 7th session at general conference concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. Paris, France. New York: United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-11

How to Cite

Rani, P., Putri, C., & Devina, A. (2017). TRANSFORMING HERITAGE BUILDING FOR COMMERCIALISATION. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i3.304